From: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com>,
<olivier.matz@6wind.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Allow application set mempool handle
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:07:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e78b067-0a4d-a40d-799e-6137972bd7a9@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170619130152.GA29671@jerin>
On 6/19/2017 6:31 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
>> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 17:22:46 +0530
>> From: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
>> To: Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com>,
>> olivier.matz@6wind.com, dev@dpdk.org
>> CC: jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Allow application set mempool handle
>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
>> Thunderbird/45.8.0
>>
>> On 6/1/2017 1:35 PM, Santosh Shukla wrote:
>>> Some platform can have two different NICs for example external PCI Intel
>>> 40G card and Integrated NIC like vNIC/octeontx/dpaa2.
>>>
>>> Both NICs like to use their preferred pool e.g. external PCI card/ vNIC's
>>> preferred pool would be the ring based pool and octeontx/dpaa2 preferred would
>>> be ext-mempools.
>>> Right now, Framework doesn't support such case. Only one pool can be
>>> used across two different NIC's. For that, user has to statically set
>>> CONFIG_RTE_MEMPOOL_DEFAULT_OPS=<pool-name>.
>>>
>>> So proposing two approaches:
>>> Patch 1) Introducing eal option --pkt-mempool=<pool-name>
>>> Patch 2) Introducing ethdev API called _get_preferred_pool(), where PMD driver
>>> gets a chance to advertise their pool capability to the application. And based
>>> on that hint- application creates pools for that driver.
If the system is having more than one heterogeneous ethernet device with
different mempool, the application has to create different mempool for
each of the ethernet device.
However, let's take a case
As system has a DPAA2 eth device, which only work with dpaa2 mempools.
System also detect a standard PCI NIC, which can work with any software
mempool (e.g ring_mp_mc) or with dpaa2 mempool. Given the preference,
PCI NIC will have preferred as software mempool.
how the application will choose between these, if it want to create only
one mempool?
Or, how the scheme will work if the application want to create only one
mempool?
>>>
>> The idea is good. it will help the vendors with hw mempool support.
>>
>> On a similar line, I also submitted a patch to check the existence of a
>> mempool instance.
>> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/15877/
>>
>> Option 1) requires manual knowledge of underlying NIC and different commands
>> for different machines.
>>
>> Option 2) this will help more as it allows the application to take decision
>> autonomously.
>>
>> In addition to it, we can also extend the overall MEMPOOL_OPS support.
>> 3) currently we support defining only one "RTE_MBUF_DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_OPS"
>> this can be supported to publish a priority list of MEMPOOL_OPS in
>> config. if one is not available, application can try the next one in
>> priority list as supported by the platform.
>>
>> 4) we can also try something, where the existing application can also be
>> supported.
>> - default mempool is configured as alias. This is with empty ops.
>> - based on the mempool detections on the bus, the bus configure the
>> mempool ops internally with the actual ones.
>
> What if both HW are on PCIe bus(That the case for us)? Any scheme to fix
> that?
Nothing without a hackish approach. In our case, there is only a one
mempool type on one type of platform specific bus.
>
>
>>
>>
>>> Santosh Shukla (2):
>>> eal: Introducing option to set mempool handle
>>> ether/ethdev: Allow pmd to advertise preferred pool capability
>>>
>>> lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c | 9 +++++++
>>> lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map | 7 +++++
>>> lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c | 3 +++
>>> lib/librte_eal/common/eal_internal_cfg.h | 2 ++
>>> lib/librte_eal/common/eal_options.h | 2 ++
>>> lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal.h | 9 +++++++
>>> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map | 7 +++++
>>> lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 16 +++++++++++
>>> lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 21 +++++++++++++++
>>> lib/librte_ether/rte_ether_version.map | 7 +++++
>>> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c | 8 ++++--
>>> 12 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-20 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-01 8:05 Santosh Shukla
2017-06-01 8:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] eal: Introducing option to " Santosh Shukla
2017-06-30 14:12 ` Olivier Matz
2017-07-04 12:33 ` santosh
2017-06-01 8:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ether/ethdev: Allow pmd to advertise preferred pool capability Santosh Shukla
2017-06-30 14:13 ` Olivier Matz
2017-07-04 12:39 ` santosh
2017-07-04 13:07 ` Olivier Matz
2017-07-04 14:12 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-06-19 11:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Allow application set mempool handle Hemant Agrawal
2017-06-19 13:01 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-06-20 10:37 ` Hemant Agrawal [this message]
2017-06-20 14:04 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-06-30 14:12 ` Olivier Matz
2017-07-04 12:25 ` santosh
2017-07-04 15:59 ` Olivier Matz
2017-07-05 7:48 ` santosh
2017-07-20 7:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] Dynamically configure " Santosh Shukla
2017-07-20 7:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] eal: allow user to override default pool handle Santosh Shukla
2017-08-15 8:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] Dynamically configure mempool handle Santosh Shukla
2017-08-15 8:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] eal: allow user to override default pool handle Santosh Shukla
2017-09-04 11:46 ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-07 9:25 ` Hemant Agrawal
2017-08-15 8:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] ethdev: allow pmd to advertise " Santosh Shukla
2017-09-04 12:11 ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-04 13:14 ` santosh
2017-09-07 9:21 ` Hemant Agrawal
2017-09-07 10:06 ` santosh
2017-09-07 10:11 ` santosh
2017-09-07 11:08 ` Hemant Agrawal
2017-09-11 9:33 ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-11 12:40 ` santosh
2017-09-11 13:00 ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-04 9:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] Dynamically configure mempool handle Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2017-09-04 13:20 ` santosh
2017-09-04 13:34 ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-04 14:24 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2017-09-05 7:47 ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-05 8:11 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-09-11 15:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Santosh Shukla
2017-09-11 15:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] eal: allow user to override default pool handle Santosh Shukla
2017-09-25 7:28 ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-25 21:23 ` santosh
2017-09-11 15:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: get the supported pools for a port Santosh Shukla
2017-09-25 7:37 ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-25 21:52 ` santosh
2017-09-29 5:00 ` santosh
2017-09-29 8:32 ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-29 10:16 ` santosh
2017-09-29 11:21 ` santosh
2017-09-29 11:23 ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-29 11:31 ` santosh
2017-09-13 10:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] Dynamically configure mempool handle santosh
2017-09-19 8:28 ` santosh
2017-09-25 7:24 ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-25 21:58 ` santosh
2017-10-01 9:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " Santosh Shukla
2017-10-01 9:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] eal: allow user to override default pool handle Santosh Shukla
2017-10-02 14:29 ` Olivier MATZ
2017-10-06 0:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-06 3:31 ` santosh
2017-10-06 8:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-06 7:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/2] Dynamically configure mempool handle Santosh Shukla
2017-10-06 7:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] eal: allow user to override default pool handle Santosh Shukla
2017-10-06 7:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] ethdev: get the supported pool for a port Santosh Shukla
2017-10-06 18:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/2] Dynamically configure mempool handle Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-01 9:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] ethdev: get the supported pool for a port Santosh Shukla
2017-10-02 14:31 ` Olivier MATZ
2017-10-06 0:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-06 3:32 ` santosh
2017-10-02 8:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] Dynamically configure mempool handle santosh
2017-07-20 7:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] ethdev: allow pmd to advertise pool handle Santosh Shukla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2e78b067-0a4d-a40d-799e-6137972bd7a9@nxp.com \
--to=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).