DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Remy Horton <remy.horton@intel.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
	Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
	Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
	Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] ethdev: add support for PMD-tuned Tx/Rx parameters
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:48:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <30b8575d-4aeb-912d-6f74-c49ad7ce879a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <023fbd6c-7cac-6c8b-9a40-7a62e5d47bb7@intel.com>


On 14/03/2018 14:43, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
[..]
>>  lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>  lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
>
> Can you please remove deprecation notice in this patch.

Done.

>> +	/* Defaults for drivers that don't implement preferred
>> +	 * queue parameters.
[..]
> Not sure about having these defaults here. It is OK to have defaults in driver,
> in application or in config file, but I am not sure if putting them into device
> abstraction layer hides them.
>
> What about not providing any default in ethdev layer, and get zero as invalid
> when using them?

This is something I have been thinking about, and I am going to remove 
them for the V2. Original motive was to avoid breaking testpmd for PMDs 
that don't give defaults (i.e. almost all of them). The alternative is 
to put place-holders into all the PMDs themselves, but I am not sure if 
this is appropriate.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-14 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-07 12:08 [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] ethdev: add per-PMD tuning of RxTx parmeters Remy Horton
2018-03-07 12:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] ethdev: add support for PMD-tuned Tx/Rx parameters Remy Horton
2018-03-14 12:28   ` Shreyansh Jain
2018-03-14 14:09     ` Remy Horton
2018-03-14 14:43   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-14 15:10     ` Shreyansh Jain
2018-03-15  9:02       ` Remy Horton
2018-03-14 15:48     ` Remy Horton [this message]
2018-03-14 16:42       ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-14 17:23         ` Shreyansh Jain
2018-03-14 17:52           ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-14 18:53             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-03-14 21:02               ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-14 21:36                 ` Bruce Richardson
2018-03-15 13:57                   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-15 14:39                     ` Bruce Richardson
2018-03-15 14:57                       ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-16 13:54                         ` Shreyansh Jain
2018-03-16 14:18                           ` Bruce Richardson
2018-03-16 15:36                           ` Remy Horton
2018-03-20 15:03                             ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-21 10:14                               ` Remy Horton
2018-03-21 13:56                                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-20 14:54                           ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-21  6:51                             ` Shreyansh Jain
2018-03-21 10:02                               ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-21 10:45                                 ` Shreyansh Jain
2018-03-15 12:51                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-03-15 13:57                   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-15 14:42                     ` Bruce Richardson
2018-03-07 12:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 2/4] net/e1000: add TxRx tuning parameters Remy Horton
2018-03-07 12:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] net/i40e: " Remy Horton
2018-03-07 12:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 4/4] testpmd: make use of per-PMD TxRx parameters Remy Horton
2018-03-21 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] ethdev: add per-PMD tuning of RxTx parmeters Remy Horton
2018-03-21 14:27   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] ethdev: add support for PMD-tuned Tx/Rx parameters Remy Horton
2018-03-28  7:11     ` Shreyansh Jain
2018-03-30 15:40     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-03-30 15:57       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-03-31  0:46     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-03-21 14:27   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] net/e1000: add TxRx tuning parameters Remy Horton
2018-03-21 14:27   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] net/i40e: " Remy Horton
2018-03-21 14:27   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] testpmd: make use of per-PMD TxRx parameters Remy Horton
2018-03-28  7:18     ` Shreyansh Jain
2018-04-03 11:00       ` Remy Horton
2018-03-31  0:01     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-03  8:49       ` Remy Horton
2018-03-27 18:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] ethdev: add per-PMD tuning of RxTx parmeters Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-30 10:34     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-31  0:05       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-04 17:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Remy Horton
2018-04-04 17:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] ethdev: add support for PMD-tuned Tx/Rx parameters Remy Horton
2018-04-04 18:56       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-04-05 10:16         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-04 17:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] net/e1000: add TxRx tuning parameters Remy Horton
2018-04-04 17:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] net/i40e: " Remy Horton
2018-04-04 17:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] testpmd: make use of per-PMD TxRx parameters Remy Horton
2018-04-06 14:49     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] ethdev: add per-PMD tuning of RxTx parmeters Remy Horton
2018-04-06 14:49       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] ethdev: add support for PMD-tuned Tx/Rx parameters Remy Horton
2018-04-06 14:50       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] net/e1000: add TxRx tuning parameters Remy Horton
2018-04-06 14:50       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] net/i40e: " Remy Horton
2018-04-06 14:50       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] testpmd: make use of per-PMD TxRx parameters Remy Horton
2018-04-09 12:55         ` Shreyansh Jain
2018-04-09 14:38           ` Remy Horton
2018-04-10  4:18             ` Shreyansh Jain
2018-04-10  6:09               ` Remy Horton
2018-04-10  6:39                 ` Shreyansh Jain
2018-04-06 17:01       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] ethdev: add per-PMD tuning of RxTx parmeters Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-10  9:43       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 " Remy Horton
2018-04-10  9:43         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/4] ethdev: add support for PMD-tuned Tx/Rx parameters Remy Horton
2018-04-10  9:43         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/4] net/e1000: add TxRx tuning parameters Remy Horton
2018-04-10  9:43         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] net/i40e: " Remy Horton
2018-04-10  9:43         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/4] testpmd: make use of per-PMD TxRx parameters Remy Horton
2018-04-10 12:57         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/4] ethdev: add per-PMD tuning of RxTx parmeters Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-10 18:56         ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=30b8575d-4aeb-912d-6f74-c49ad7ce879a@intel.com \
    --to=remy.horton@intel.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=shreyansh.jain@nxp.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).