DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 8/8] virtio/lib:add guest offload handle
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:19:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3146122.45QdW36GMG@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151111082318.GY2326@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>

Yuanhan,
You deserve a "review award"!
Thanks a lot

2015-11-11 16:23, Yuanhan Liu:
> Regarding to your patch title, there are two minor pits:
> 
> - the prefix should be "vhost" but not "virtio/lib".
> 
> - you should add an extra space after ":"
> 
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:40:46PM +0800, Jijiang Liu wrote:
> > Enqueue guest offload(CSUM and TSO) handle.
> 
> (ALL) Your patch lacks some explanation. And I don't think it's about
> guest offload handling, it's about setting the right offload fields for
> RX side, such as VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM.
> 
> And you need spend few words to state why that is required. Something
> like following might help others to review:
> 
>     For packet going through from one VM to another VM without passing
>     the NIC, and the VM claiming that it supports checksum offload,
>     no one will actually calculate the checksum, hence, the packet
>     will be dropped at TCP layer, due to checksum validation is failed.
> 
>     However, for VM2VM case, there is no need to do checksum, for we
>     think the data should be reliable enough, and setting VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM
>     at RX side will let the TCP layer to bypass the checksum validation,
>     so that the RX side could receive the packet in the end.
> 
>     At RX side, the offload information is inherited from mbuf, which is
>     in turn inherited from TX side. If we can still get those info at RX
>     side, it means the packet is from another VM at same host.  So, it's
>     safe to set the VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM, to skip checksum validation.
> 
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Jijiang Liu <jijiang.liu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/librte_vhost/vhost_rxtx.c |   45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_rxtx.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_rxtx.c
> > index 9e70990..468fed8 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_rxtx.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_rxtx.c
> > @@ -54,6 +54,42 @@ is_valid_virt_queue_idx(uint32_t idx, int is_tx, uint32_t qp_nb)
> >  	return (is_tx ^ (idx & 1)) == 0 && idx < qp_nb * VIRTIO_QNUM;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void
> > +virtio_enqueue_offload(struct rte_mbuf *m_buf, struct virtio_net_hdr *net_hdr)
> > +{
> 
> As virtio_hdr is set per mbuf, you'd better reset net_hdr first before
> setting it. Otherwise, if this mbuf has no offload related stuff, you
> may still get a net_hdr with offload related fields set, due to last
> mbuf has that.
> 
> I know the chance is rare, but it's for code logic.
> 
> 
> 	--yliu

      reply	other threads:[~2015-11-11 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-11  6:40 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/8] add virtio offload support in us-vhost Jijiang Liu
2015-11-11  6:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/8] driver/virtio:add virtual address for virtio net header Jijiang Liu
2015-11-11  6:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/8] driver/virtio:record virtual address of " Jijiang Liu
2015-11-11  6:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/8] virtio/lib:add vhost TX checksum support capabilities Jijiang Liu
2015-11-11  8:26   ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-11-11 17:31     ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-11-12  1:41       ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-11-11  6:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/8] virtio/lib:dequeue vhost TX offload Jijiang Liu
2015-11-11  6:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/8] sample/vhost:remove ip_hdr structure defination Jijiang Liu
2015-11-11  8:34   ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-11-11 10:05     ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-11  6:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/8] examples/vhost:support TX offload in vhost sample Jijiang Liu
2015-11-11  6:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 7/8] virtio/lib:add virtio guest offload capabilities Jijiang Liu
2015-11-11  8:31   ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-11-11  8:38     ` Liu, Jijiang
2015-11-11  8:44       ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-11-11  8:53         ` Liu, Jijiang
2015-11-11  8:57           ` Xu, Qian Q
2015-11-11 11:10             ` Liu, Jijiang
2015-11-11 10:08           ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-11 12:53           ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-11-11  6:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 8/8] virtio/lib:add guest offload handle Jijiang Liu
2015-11-11  8:23   ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-11-11 10:19     ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3146122.45QdW36GMG@xps13 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).