DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stephen@networkplumber.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] Introducing SPDX License Identifiers
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 19:32:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3307824.7b7B2xNfMZ@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1513678481-30653-1-git-send-email-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>

19/12/2017 11:14, Hemant Agrawal:
> The DPDK uses the Open Source BSD-3-Clause license for the core libraries
> and drivers. The kernel components are naturally GPLv2 licensed.
> 
> Many of the files in the DPDK source code contain the full text of the
> applicable license. For example, most of the BSD-3-Clause files contain a
> full copy of the BSD-3-Clause license text.
> 
> Including big blocks of License headers in all files blows up the source
> code with mostly redundant information.  An additional problem is that even
> the same licenses are referred to by a number of slightly varying text
> blocks (full, abbreviated, different indentation, line wrapping and/or
> white space, with obsolete address information, ...) which makes validation
> and automatic processing a nightmare.
> 
> To make this easier, DPDK uses of a single line reference to
> Unique License Identifiers in source files as defined by the Linux
> Foundation's SPDX project https://spdk.org.
> 
> Adding license information in this fashion, rather than adding full license
> text, can be more efficient for developers; decreases errors; and improves
> automated detection of licenses. The current set of valid, predefined SPDX
> identifiers is set forth on the SPDX License List at
> https://spdx.org/licenses/.
> 
> For example, to label a file as subject to the BSD-3-Clause license,
> the following text would be used as the top line of the file.
> 
> SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> 
> Note: Any new file contributions in DPDK shall adhere to the above scheme.
> It is also recommended to replace or at least amend the existing license
> text in the code with SPDX-License-Identifiers.
> 
> Any exception to DPDK IP policies shall be approved by DPDK tech board and
> DPDK Governing Board. Steps for any exception approval:
> 1. Mention the appropriate license identifier form SPDX. If the license is
>    not listed in SPDX Licenses. It is the submitters responsibiliity to get
>    it first listed.
> 2. Get the required approval from the DPDK Technical Board. Technical board
>    may advise the author to check alternate means first. If no other
>    alternatives are found and the merit of the contributions are important
>    for DPDK's mission, it may decide on such exception with two-thirds vote
>    of the members.
> 3. Technical board then approach Governing board for such limited approval
>    for the given contribution only.
> 
> Any approvals shall be documented in "licenses/exceptions.txt" with record
> dates.
> 
> Note: From the legal point of view, this patch is supposed to be only a
> change to the textual representation of the license information, but in no
> way any change to the actual license terms. With this patch applied, all
> files will still be licensed under the same terms they were before.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
> Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>

Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>

Applied, thanks

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-04 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-27  7:46 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] " Hemant Agrawal
2017-11-27  7:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Change root makefile license to SPDX tag Hemant Agrawal
2017-11-27 12:01   ` Bruce Richardson
2017-12-01  8:41     ` Hemant Agrawal
2017-11-28 16:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Introducing SPDX License Identifiers Stephen Hemminger
2017-12-01  8:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-01  8:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] Change root makefile license to SPDX tag Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-07 23:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] Introducing SPDX License Identifiers Ferruh Yigit
2017-12-08  4:57     ` Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-08  7:41   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] " Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-08  7:41     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] change root makefile license to SPDX tag Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-08  7:41     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] change NXP dpaa2 code License text to SPDX tags Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-08 18:07       ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-12-08  7:41     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] change NXP dpaa " Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-13 10:46     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] Introducing SPDX License Identifiers Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-13 11:38       ` Bruce Richardson
2017-12-13 15:38         ` Wiles, Keith
2017-12-15 10:52           ` Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-18 12:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-18 12:39       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] change root makefile license to SPDX tag Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-18 14:32         ` Bruce Richardson
2017-12-18 15:52         ` Bruce Richardson
2017-12-18 16:30           ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-19  5:29             ` Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-19 10:01               ` Bruce Richardson
2017-12-18 12:39       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] change NXP dpaa2 code License text to SPDX tags Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-18 12:39       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] change NXP dpaa " Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-19 10:14       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] Introducing SPDX License Identifiers Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-19 10:14         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] change root makefile license to SPDX tag Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-19 10:23           ` Bruce Richardson
2017-12-19 10:14         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] change NXP dpaa2 code License text to SPDX tags Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-19 10:14         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] change NXP dpaa " Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-04 18:32         ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3307824.7b7B2xNfMZ@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).