DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, mb@smartsharesystems.com,
	skori@marvell.com, jerinj@marvell.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: fix use wrong time API
Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 18:49:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3448381.piLNI76ssM@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1619662241-61955-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com>

29/04/2021 04:10, Min Hu (Connor):
> Currently, the mp uses gettimeofday() API to get the time, and used as
> timeout parameter.
> 
> But the time which gets from gettimeofday() API isn't monotonically
> increasing. The process may fail if the system time is changed.
> 
> This fixes it by using clock_gettime() API with monotonic attribution.
> 
> Fixes: 783b6e54971d ("eal: add synchronous multi-process communication")
> Fixes: f05e26051c15 ("eal: add IPC asynchronous request")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
> ---
[...]
> --- a/lib/eal/common/eal_common_proc.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/common/eal_common_proc.c
> -	if (gettimeofday(&now, NULL) < 0) {
> -		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Cannot get current time\n");
> -		goto no_trigger;
> -	}
> -	ts_now.tv_nsec = now.tv_usec * 1000;
> -	ts_now.tv_sec = now.tv_sec;
> +	clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &ts_now);

Why not testing the return value?

I think this change would not be appropriate after -rc1.
If you agree, I will postpone to DPDK 21.08.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-04 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-28  8:12 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-28  9:24 ` Morten Brørup
2021-04-28 10:36   ` fengchengwen
2021-04-28 10:59     ` Morten Brørup
2021-04-29  2:12       ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-29  2:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-29  7:12   ` Morten Brørup
2021-05-04 16:49   ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-05-04 19:12     ` Morten Brørup
2021-05-05  6:14       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-05  6:26         ` Morten Brørup
2021-05-05  6:51           ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-05  7:08             ` Morten Brørup
2021-05-05  3:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Chengwen Feng
2021-05-11  7:36     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-11 10:49       ` fengchengwen
2021-05-11 10:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Chengwen Feng
2021-05-12 14:52   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3448381.piLNI76ssM@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=humin29@huawei.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=skori@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).