From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Carrillo, Erik G" <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: return true or false from lcore role check function
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 19:04:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3633241.u0AhPmFv0D@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BE54F058557D9A4FAC1D84E2FC6D87570EDA076F@fmsmsx115.amr.corp.intel.com>
12/01/2018 19:01, Carrillo, Erik G:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> > 12/01/2018 00:09, Carrillo, Erik G:
> > > Hi Aaron,
> > >
> > > From: Aaron Conole [mailto:aconole@redhat.com]
> > > >
> > > > Hi Erik,
> > > >
> > > > Erik Gabriel Carrillo <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com> writes:
> > > >
> > > > > Update rte_lcore_has_role() so that it returns true/false instead
> > > > > of success/failure.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 78666372fa2b ("eal: add function to check lcore role")
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Erik Gabriel Carrillo <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > I believe this breaks the published abi - Success is now 'true', and
> > > > failure is 'false'; previously success would be 0 == false. You'll
> > > > need to invert the test, or note that the abi is breaking (since
> > > > semantically any caller will need to invert the test).
> > >
> > > Good point. Though it seems like an API change rather than an ABI change
> > to me, would it still be handled the same way in terms of notice? Also, the
> > ABI policy states, "ABI breakage due to changes such as reorganizing public
> > structure fields for aesthetic or readability purposes should be avoided."
> > Perhaps I should go with an alternate patch that fixes the caller.
> >
> > Most of the times, an API change is an ABI change.
> > Please make a deprecation notice.
>
> Ok, thanks Thomas - will do. Should I mark the above patch as "deferred" for the time being?
Yes, thanks
All deferred patches are set to New when starting a new release cycle.
So it should not be lost :)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-12 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-03 18:43 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/1] " Erik Gabriel Carrillo
2018-01-03 18:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] " Erik Gabriel Carrillo
2018-01-04 8:47 ` Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-01-09 16:44 ` Aaron Conole
2018-01-11 23:09 ` Carrillo, Erik G
2018-01-11 23:17 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-12 18:01 ` Carrillo, Erik G
2018-01-12 18:04 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3633241.u0AhPmFv0D@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=erik.g.carrillo@intel.com \
--cc=pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).