DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: Erik Gabriel Carrillo <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>,
	rsanford@akamai.com, thomas@monjalon.net
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] timer: fix resource leak in finalize
Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 09:29:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3809be84-8fa7-b91d-d781-f62e0506f293@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1557354906-2500-1-git-send-email-erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>

On 08-May-19 11:35 PM, Erik Gabriel Carrillo wrote:
> By using a lock added to the rte_mem_config (which lives in shared
> memory), we can synchronize multiple processes in init/finalize and
> safely free allocations made during init.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Erik Gabriel Carrillo <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>
> ---
> changes in v3:
>   - The previous version had race condition.  This version fixes the race
>     by adding a lock in shared memory outside of the DPDK heap area
>     that can be used to safely free the memzone reserved in the subsystem
>     init call. (Anatoly)
> 
>     This patch depends on http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/53333/.
>   
> changes in v2:
>   - Handle scenario where primary process exits before secondaries such
>     that memzone is not freed early (Anatoly)
> 
>   lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal_memconfig.h |  3 +++
>   lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c                      | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal_memconfig.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal_memconfig.h
> index 84aabe3..8cbc09c 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal_memconfig.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal_memconfig.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ struct rte_mem_config {
>   	rte_rwlock_t memory_hotplug_lock;
>   	/**< indicates whether memory hotplug request is in progress. */
>   
> +	rte_spinlock_t timer_subsystem_lock;
> +	/**< indicates whether timer subsystem init/finalize is in progress. */
> +

I believe there's an initialize function somewhere which will initialize 
all of these locks. This lock should be in there as well.

Other than that, i'm OK with this change, however i feel like /just/ 
adding this would be a missed opportunity, because next time we want to 
add something here it will be an ABI break again.

We could perhaps use this opportunity to leave some padding for future 
data. I'm not sure how would that look like, just an idea floating in my 
head :)

-- 
Thanks,
Anatoly

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-09  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-01 19:00 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Erik Gabriel Carrillo
2019-05-01 19:00 ` Erik Gabriel Carrillo
2019-05-02  9:18 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-05-02  9:18   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-05-02 12:19   ` Carrillo, Erik G
2019-05-02 12:19     ` Carrillo, Erik G
2019-05-02 13:03     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-05-02 13:03       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-05-02 13:48       ` Carrillo, Erik G
2019-05-02 13:48         ` Carrillo, Erik G
2019-05-03 22:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Erik Gabriel Carrillo
2019-05-03 22:54   ` Erik Gabriel Carrillo
2019-05-07 11:03   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-05-07 11:03     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-05-07 22:04     ` Carrillo, Erik G
2019-05-07 22:04       ` Carrillo, Erik G
2019-05-08  8:49       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-05-08  8:49         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-05-08 23:01         ` Carrillo, Erik G
2019-05-08 23:01           ` Carrillo, Erik G
2019-05-09  7:44           ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-09  7:44             ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-08 22:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Erik Gabriel Carrillo
2019-05-08 22:35     ` Erik Gabriel Carrillo
2019-05-09  8:29     ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]
2019-05-09  8:29       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-06-05  9:33       ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-06-05  9:47         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-06-25 16:11     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Fix timer resource leak Anatoly Burakov
2019-07-05 13:20       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/1] " Anatoly Burakov
2019-07-05 17:22         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Anatoly Burakov
2019-07-05 17:22         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/1] timer: fix resource leak in finalize Anatoly Burakov
2019-07-05 22:06           ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-07-05 13:20       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Anatoly Burakov
2019-06-25 16:11     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] eal: add internal locks for timer lib into EAL Anatoly Burakov
2019-06-27 18:41       ` Carrillo, Erik G
2019-07-04  9:09       ` David Marchand
2019-07-04 10:44         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-06-25 16:11     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] timer: fix resource leak in finalize Anatoly Burakov
2019-06-27 18:48       ` Carrillo, Erik G
2019-07-04  9:10       ` David Marchand
2019-07-04 10:45         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-04 10:50           ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3809be84-8fa7-b91d-d781-f62e0506f293@intel.com \
    --to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=erik.g.carrillo@intel.com \
    --cc=rsanford@akamai.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).