DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pattan, Reshma" <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
To: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] add dpdk packet capture support for	tcpdump
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:16:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831FFC6353@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <014201d16a55$d05e4b20$711ae160$@samsung.com>

Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pavel Fedin [mailto:p.fedin@samsung.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 2:08 PM
> To: Pattan, Reshma <reshma.pattan@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] add dpdk packet capture support for
> tcpdump
> 
> 
>  1. Perhaps, ability to separate queues is useful for something. But not always.
> For example, what if i want to capture all the traffic which passes through some
> interface (common use case)? For example, with OpenVSwitch i can have 9
> queues on my networking card. So, i have to enumerate all of them:
> (0,0)(0,1)(0,2)... It's insane and inconvenient with many queues. What if you
> could have shorthand notation, like (0) or (0,*) for this?

I will fix this in my next version of patch.

>  2. What if i don't want separate RX and TX streams either? It only prevents me
> from seeing the complete picture.

Do you mean not to have separate pcap files for tx and rx? If so, I would prefer to keep this as it is.
Because pcap changes need to be replaced with TUN/TAP pmd once available in future. 

>  3. vhostuser ports are missing. Perhaps not really related to this patchset, i just
> don't know how much code "server" part of vhostuser shares with normal PMDs,
> but anyway, ability to dump them too would be nice to have.
> 

I think this can be done in future i.e. when vhost as PMD is available. But as of now vhost is library.

>  Not directly related, but could we have some interface to tcpdump or
> wireshark? Would be good to have ability to dump packets in real time.

This  can be done in future once KNI or TUN/TAP PMDs is  available in DPDK.

Thanks,
Reshma

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-23 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-12 14:57 Reshma Pattan
2016-02-12 14:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] app/test-pmd: fix nb_rxq and nb_txq checks Reshma Pattan
2016-02-12 14:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] drivers/net/pcap: add public api to create pcap device Reshma Pattan
2016-02-17  9:03   ` Pavel Fedin
2016-02-12 14:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] app/proc_info: add tcpdump support in secondary process Reshma Pattan
2016-02-12 14:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] lib/librte_eal: add tcpdump support in primary process Reshma Pattan
2016-02-17  9:57   ` Pavel Fedin
2016-02-12 14:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] doc: update doc for tcpdump feature Reshma Pattan
2016-02-22 10:01   ` Mcnamara, John
2016-02-18 14:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] add dpdk packet capture support for tcpdump Pavel Fedin
2016-02-23 13:16   ` Pattan, Reshma [this message]
2016-02-24 15:04     ` Pavel Fedin
2016-02-29 16:11       ` Pattan, Reshma
2016-03-02 12:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Reshma Pattan
2016-03-02 12:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] app/test-pmd: fix nb_rxq and nb_txq checks Reshma Pattan
2016-03-02 12:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] drivers/net/pcap: add public api to create pcap device Reshma Pattan
2016-03-02 12:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/5] app/proc_info: add tcpdump support in secondary process Reshma Pattan
2016-03-02 12:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/5] lib/librte_eal: add tcpdump support in primary process Reshma Pattan
2016-03-02 12:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/5] doc: update doc for tcpdump feature Reshma Pattan
2016-03-09  0:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] add dpdk packet capture support for tcpdump Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-11 14:18     ` Pattan, Reshma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831FFC6353@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=p.fedin@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).