DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>,
	Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
	Shijith Thotton <shijith.thotton@caviumnetworks.com>,
	Gregory Etelson <gregory@weka.io>,
	Harish Patil <harish.patil@cavium.com>,
	George Prekas <george.prekas@epfl.ch>,
	Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>,
	Rasesh Mody <rasesh.mody@cavium.com>,
	Lee Roberts <lee.roberts@hpe.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] igb_uio: prevent reset for a list of devices
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:49:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c0fb383-552b-b212-c0a0-9267a12afad9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG2-GknAx_N_dbQAcVnmSDSF01ivfP7shZUd5ewJdZK1GCsbbA@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/7/2017 10:12 AM, Chas Williams wrote:
> Environment: Dell PowerEdge R730, Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+
> Network Connection shared via PCI pass-through
> Host: Debian 8
> Guest: Custom Debian 8 with DPDK application based on 17.11
> 
> When we shutdown the guest, the kernel panics with:
> 
> [  279.021818] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
> [  279.021819] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
> [  279.021847] {1}[Hardware Error]: Hardware error from APEI Generic Hardware
> Error Source: 3
> [  279.021849] {1}[Hardware Error]: event severity: fatal
> [  279.021850] {1}[Hardware Error]:  Error 0, type: fatal
> [  279.021851] {1}[Hardware Error]:   section_type: PCIe error
> [  279.021852] {1}[Hardware Error]:   port_type: 0, PCIe end point
> [  279.021853] {1}[Hardware Error]:   version: 1.16
> [  279.021854] {1}[Hardware Error]:   command: 0x0507, status: 0x4010
> [  279.021855] {1}[Hardware Error]:   device_id: 0000:03:00.0
> [  279.021855] {1}[Hardware Error]:   slot: 0
> [  279.021856] {1}[Hardware Error]:   secondary_bus: 0x00
> [  279.021857] {1}[Hardware Error]:   vendor_id: 0x8086, device_id: 0x10fb
> [  279.021858] {1}[Hardware Error]:   class_code: 000002
> [  279.021859] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal hardware error!
> [  279.021977] sched: Unexpected reschedule of offline CPU#1!
> [  279.021984] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [  279.021992] WARNING: CPU: 43 PID: 2807 at
> /build/linux-fHlJSJ/linux-4.12.6/arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:128
> native_smp_send_reschedule+0x34/0x40
> [  279.021993] Modules linked in: vfio_pci vfio_virqfd vfio_iommu_type1 vfio
> openvswitch nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_nat_ipv6 nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4
> nf_nat_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_nat nf_conntrack libcrc32c crc32c_generic nfsd
> nfs_aclr
> pcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 dns_resolver nfs lockd grace sunrpc fscache tun
> intel_rapl sb_edac x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp kvm_intel kvm
> irqbypass mgag200 ttm drm_kms_helper drm joydev crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmu
> l ghash_clmulni_intel i2c_algo_bit ipmi_si ipmi_devintf iTCO_wdt intel_cstate
> iTCO_vendor_support evdev intel_uncore mxm_wmi lpc_ich ipmi_msghandler mfd_core
> ioatdma intel_rapl_perf dcdbas pcspkr shpchp mei_me button wmi mei acpi_power_m
> eter tpm_crb autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 fscrypto mbcache sr_mod cdrom sg
> hid_generic usbhid hid sd_mod
> [  279.022044]  crc32c_intel aesni_intel aes_x86_64 crypto_simd cryptd
> glue_helper ahci ehci_pci libahci ehci_hcd ixgbe libata megaraid_sas usbcore dca
> i40e usb_common ptp pps_core scsi_mod mdio
> [  279.022060] CPU: 43 PID: 2807 Comm: revalidator85 Not tainted 4.12.0-1-amd64
> #1 Debian 4.12.6-1
> [  279.022061] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R730/0WCJNT, BIOS 2.3.4 11/08/2016
> [  279.022062] task: ffff91d0473f7100 task.stack: ffffafef8f4a4000
> [  279.022066] RIP: 0010:native_smp_send_reschedule+0x34/0x40
> [  279.022067] RSP: 0018:ffffafef8f4a7c98 EFLAGS: 00010082
> [  279.022069] RAX: 000000000000002e RBX: ffff91d059d24080 RCX: 0000000000000001
> [  279.022070] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 0000000000000046
> [  279.022071] RBP: ffff91d04691d100 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000002e
> [  279.022072] R10: ffffafef8f4a7c90 R11: 00000000001cbb78 R12: ffff91d85d21ae80
> [  279.022073] R13: ffff91d059d24000 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 0000000000000008
> [  279.022075] FS:  00007f726affd700(0000) GS:ffff91d85d740000(0000)
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> [  279.022076] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [  279.022077] CR2: 00007fd422a52c48 CR3: 000000042d90f000 CR4: 00000000003426e0
> [  279.022078] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> [  279.022079] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> [  279.022080] Call Trace:
> [  279.022086]  ? check_preempt_wakeup+0x181/0x220
> [  279.022091]  ? check_preempt_curr+0x74/0x80
> [  279.022094]  ? ttwu_do_wakeup+0x19/0x140
> [  279.022098]  ? try_to_wake_up+0x1b8/0x470
> [  279.022101]  ? wake_up_q+0x3f/0x70
> [  279.022106]  ? futex_wake+0x15a/0x170
> [  279.022108]  ? do_futex+0x2df/0xa90
> [  279.022111]  ? SyS_futex+0x7a/0x170
> [  279.022113]  ? SyS_read+0x76/0xc0
> [  279.022118]  ? system_call_fast_compare_end+0xc/0x97
> [  279.022119] Code: a3 05 51 fb cc 00 73 15 48 8b 05 28 74 a3 00 be fd 00 00 00
> 48 8b 80 a0 00 00 00 ff e0 89 fe 48 c7 c7 88 5c de b6 e8 e2 c9 13 00 <0f> ff c3
> 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 8b 05 5d 00
> [  279.022151] ---[ end trace eddc980dc8648163 ]---
> [  279.454274] Kernel Offset: 0x35400000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation
> range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff)
> 
> The test engineer says this doesn't happen if we use SRIOV (which makes sense
> since the device isn't directly shared between the guest and the host).  If I
> remove the pci_reset_function() from igb_uio's .release, then all is well.

This was tougher than expected, so many unexpected behavior. Why resetting
pass-through device in guest cause a crash in the host?

Finally, I will send a patch to remove the reset. Hopefully no more surprises
for release.

Still there will remain two improvement in igb_uio for better security,
disabling device interrupt on exit and clear master on exit.

> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net
> <mailto:thomas@monjalon.net>> wrote:
> 
>     07/11/2017 12:50, Chas Williams:
>     > We still have an issue with this and PCI pass-through.  If a guest is
>     > restarted while using PCI pass-through and igb_uio issues a
>     > pci_reset_function(), this causes the host to crash.
> 
>     Please, could you better explain the exact scenario and the cause of the crash?
>     Thanks
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-07 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-03 22:38 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Ferruh Yigit
2017-11-03 23:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-11-04  0:56 ` Mody, Rasesh
2017-11-06 18:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ferruh Yigit
2017-11-06 23:55   ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2017-11-07 11:50     ` Chas Williams
2017-11-07 13:02       ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-11-07 18:12         ` Chas Williams
2017-11-07 18:49           ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2017-11-07 20:47             ` Chas Williams
2017-11-07 22:26               ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-11-08 12:00                 ` Chas Williams
2017-11-10  1:40                   ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-11-13 23:46                   ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-11-07 13:13       ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-11-07 18:14         ` Chas Williams
2017-11-09 17:20       ` [dpdk-dev] ugb_uio: r3.8xlarge bind failure Gregory Etelson
2017-11-10  1:42         ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-11-10  2:11           ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2017-11-10  6:36           ` [dpdk-dev] " Gregory Etelson
2017-11-15 15:44             ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-11-15 16:30               ` Gregory Etelson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3c0fb383-552b-b212-c0a0-9267a12afad9@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=3chas3@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=george.prekas@epfl.ch \
    --cc=gregory@weka.io \
    --cc=harish.patil@cavium.com \
    --cc=jianfeng.tan@intel.com \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=lee.roberts@hpe.com \
    --cc=rasesh.mody@cavium.com \
    --cc=sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com \
    --cc=shijith.thotton@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).