DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	dev@dpdk.org, thomas.monjalon@6wind.com, vido@cesnet.cz,
	fiona.trahe@intel.com, adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] drivers: advertise kmod dependencies in pmdinfo
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:12:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4057eec8-8348-350d-40fd-118a23522104@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161219124244.GB19620@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>

On 12/19/2016 12:42 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:19:59PM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 12/16/2016 12:37 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:22:08AM +0100, Olivier Matz wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:22:07 -0800, Stephen Hemminger
>>>> <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:09:12 -0500
>>>>> Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 02:46:39PM +0100, Olivier Matz wrote:  
>>>>>>> Add a new macro RTE_PMD_REGISTER_KMOD_DEP() that allows a driver
>>>>>>> to declare the list of kernel modules required to run properly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Today, most PCI drivers require uio/vfio.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
>>>>>>> Acked-by: Fiona Trahe <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> v2 -> v3:
>>>>>>> - fix kmods deps advertised by mellanox drivers as pointed out
>>>>>>>   by Adrien
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> v1 ->
>>>>>>> v2:                                                                                                
>>>>>>> - do not advertise uio_pci_generic for vf drivers
>>>>>>> - rebase on top of head: use new driver names and prefix
>>>>>>>   macro with
>>>>>>> RTE_                                                                                       
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> rfc -> v1:
>>>>>>> - the kmod information can be per-device using a modalias-like
>>>>>>>   pattern
>>>>>>> - change syntax to use '&' and '|' instead of ',' and ':'
>>>>>>> - remove useless prerequisites in kmod lis: no need to
>>>>>>>   specify both uio and uio_pci_generic, only the latter is
>>>>>>>   required
>>>>>>> - update kmod list in szedata2 driver
>>>>>>> - remove kmod list in qat driver: it requires more than just
>>>>>>> loading a kmod, which is described in documentation
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  buildtools/pmdinfogen/pmdinfogen.c      |  1 +
>>>>>>>  buildtools/pmdinfogen/pmdinfogen.h      |  1 +
>>>>>>>  drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_ethdev.c        |  2 ++
>>>>>>>  drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c          |  1 +
>>>>>>>  drivers/net/cxgbe/cxgbe_ethdev.c        |  1 +
>>>>>>>  drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c           |  1 +
>>>>>>>  drivers/net/e1000/igb_ethdev.c          |  2 ++
>>>>>>>  drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c            |  1 +
>>>>>>>  drivers/net/enic/enic_ethdev.c          |  1 +
>>>>>>>  drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c        |  1 +
>>>>>>>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c          |  1 +
>>>>>>>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c       |  1 +
>>>>>>>  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c        |  2 ++
>>>>>>>  drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4.c                 |  2 ++
>>>>>>>  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c                 |  1 +
>>>>>>>  drivers/net/nfp/nfp_net.c               |  1 +
>>>>>>>  drivers/net/qede/qede_ethdev.c          |  2 ++
>>>>>>>  drivers/net/szedata2/rte_eth_szedata2.c |  2 ++
>>>>>>>  drivers/net/thunderx/nicvf_ethdev.c     |  1 +
>>>>>>>  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c      |  1 +
>>>>>>>  drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_ethdev.c    |  1 +
>>>>>>>  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_dev.h | 25
>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/dpdk-pmdinfo.py
>>>>>>> |  5 ++++- 23 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>>     
>>>>>> Its odd that all devices, regardless of vendor should depend on the
>>>>>> igb_uio module.  It seems to me that depending on uio_pci_generic
>>>>>> or vfio is sufficient.
>>>>
>>>> igb_uio is the historical uio module of dpdk. Although it is called
>>>> igb_uio, it is not specific to Intel drivers.
>>>>
>>>> Most drivers declare "igb_uio | uio_pci_generic | vfio", which means
>>>> that any of the 3 kernel modules can be used.
>>>>
>>>> I think there are some cases where people will prefer using igb_uio,
>>>> for instance to use a vf pmd in a vm where there is no iommu,
>>>> and where the kernel vfio module does not support the no-iommu mode.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes it seems just a special case extension for Mellanox drivers.
>>>>
>>>> Kmod deps are different whether it's a vf driver or not.
>>>> Mellanox drivers are not the only drivers that do not require uio,
>>>> there is also szedata2.
>>>>
>>>> Is it an argument for not including this patch?
>>>>
>>> Speaking only for myself, I'm not suggesting the patch not be included, only
>>> questioning the need to list igb_uio as an optional dependency.  From what I
>>> understand uio_pci_generic is equaly capable of being used in a vf as igb_uio,
>>> and so it seems like its sufficient to list in the deps alone, or am I missing
>>> something?
>>>
>>> Additionally, in regards to the comment about rebasing on net-next here, I don't
>>> think thats needed.  This patch is built such that you will be able to apply
>>> this tag to additional drivers later, as they get merged into thomas's tree, you
>>> don't need to get them all in one shot.
>>
>> Right, more drivers can be added later. But also I don't see any problem
>> if this patch rebased on next-net and be a more complete patch. That is
>> why it was a question to the author.
>>
> Right, it certainly doesn't hurt anything to do so, but given that:
> 
> 1) We're on v3 of this patch
> 2) Not including information in all drivers isn't catastrophic
> 3) Rebasing on net-next still leaves the crypto drivers unaccounted for

If this patch will be extended with a new version to include crypto
drivers, yes I agree it fits better into main tree.

> 
> It seems to me that including the patch now, so that the infrastructure is in
> place for driver maintainers to add the macro on their own in their respective
> trees seems like the more expiedient course of action.
> 
> Best
> Neil
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-19 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-26 13:20 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] " Olivier Matz
2016-08-30  8:40 ` Matej Vido
2016-08-30  8:56   ` Olivier Matz
2016-08-30 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-dev, RFC] " Neil Horman
2016-08-31  9:21   ` Olivier Matz
2016-08-31 13:27     ` Neil Horman
2016-08-31 13:39       ` Olivier Matz
2016-09-01 12:55         ` Trahe, Fiona
2016-09-01 17:35           ` Neil Horman
2016-09-01 17:41             ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-09-01 19:15               ` Neil Horman
2016-09-02  9:19                 ` Trahe, Fiona
2016-09-02 13:33                   ` Neil Horman
2016-09-02 13:52                     ` Trahe, Fiona
2016-09-02 14:15                       ` Neil Horman
2016-09-02 16:13                         ` Olivier Matz
2016-09-02 10:55               ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-09-15 14:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Olivier Matz
2016-09-16  9:49   ` Trahe, Fiona
2016-09-16 14:26   ` David Marchand
2016-09-19  8:17     ` Bruce Richardson
2016-09-19 12:25       ` Olivier Matz
2016-11-22  9:50   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Olivier Matz
2016-11-22 10:27     ` Adrien Mazarguil
2016-11-22 10:31       ` Olivier Matz
2016-12-15 13:46     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Olivier Matz
2016-12-15 14:52       ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-12-16  9:36         ` Olivier Matz
2016-12-19 13:30           ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-12-15 16:09       ` Neil Horman
2016-12-15 17:22         ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-12-16  9:22           ` Olivier Matz
2016-12-16 12:37             ` Neil Horman
2016-12-16 13:04               ` Bruce Richardson
2016-12-16 14:19               ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-12-19 12:42                 ` Neil Horman
2016-12-19 14:12                   ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2016-12-16  8:23       ` Adrien Mazarguil
2016-12-20 17:26         ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-12-21  9:21           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2016-12-21 11:37             ` Neil Horman
2016-12-21 11:40               ` Andrew Rybchenko
2016-12-22 11:04                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-12-22 11:35                   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2016-12-22 12:07                     ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-12-22 12:08                       ` Andrew Rybchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4057eec8-8348-350d-40fd-118a23522104@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=vido@cesnet.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).