DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Finn Christensen <fc@napatech.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Yuanhan Liu <yliu@fridaylinux.org>,
	Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
	Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>,
	Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>,
	"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] standardize device identification
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 16:34:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40957417.C216t4nj8c@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd55db8afed749f5a71f919e7f5d7633@napatech.com>

05/01/2018 15:14, Finn Christensen:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> >05/01/2018 12:09, Finn Christensen:
> >> From: Thomas Monjalon
> >>     Which property can help to distinguish Napatech ports?
> >>     Can you use class=eth,dev_port=X ?
> >>     The dev_port property will use /sys/class/net/DEV/dev_port on Linux. Is it
> >>     OK for you?
> >>
> >> Actually, what we were thinking of was using the mac property in the
> >> class category to distinguish our ports.
> >> For instance:
> >> -w bus=pci,id=0000:01:00.0/class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:55
> >> or simply:
> >> -w class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:55
> >
> >The problem with the mac property is that it cannot be used for
> >white/blacklisting in DPDK because the MAC is not known before port
> >initialization.
> >
> 
> Sure, that makes sense. I just for a minute thought that we could use that
> mechanism to enable individual ports at startup also. We will continue to
> use proprietary devargs passed by whiterlist to the PMD probe function.
> What we needed was a way to select the individual ports, by using
> rte_eth_dev_get_port_by_name().

The whitelist will be replaced by this new syntax.
And yes, you can have your own driver-specific property with this syntax.

> >> We will not be able to support the dev_port property, that will not work for
> >us.
> >> At least not for now.

It leads to a totally different question:
Can we discuss again how to integrate your driver in DPDK upstream?
Please explain again your situation in a new thread.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-05 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-30  7:35 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] ether: standardize getting the port by name Yuanhan Liu
2017-11-30 17:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-11-30 17:35   ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-11-30 21:21     ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-11-30 21:44       ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-01  9:47         ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-12-04 13:55           ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-12-05 11:04             ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-12-05 13:20               ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-05 13:58                 ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-12-05 15:28                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-05 17:22                     ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-12-06 15:49                       ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-12-18 22:25                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-18 22:30                   ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-12-18 22:41                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-18 23:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-20 22:02   ` [dpdk-dev] standardize device identification Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-22  7:01     ` Shreyansh Jain
2017-12-22  9:00       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-05  7:52     ` Finn Christensen
2018-01-05  8:39       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-05 11:09         ` Finn Christensen
2018-01-05 12:01           ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-05 14:14             ` Finn Christensen
2018-01-05 15:34               ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2018-01-05 20:32                 ` Finn Christensen
2018-01-16 20:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] ether: standardize getting the port by name Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40957417.C216t4nj8c@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fc@napatech.com \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=yliu@fridaylinux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).