From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
To: "Zhang, AlvinX" <alvinx.zhang@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
"ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com" <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Singh, Aman Deep" <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] ethdev: add IPv4 and L4 checksum RSS offload types
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 13:24:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40d6213e-2d8f-fc95-a3ef-4c5a2a4616e9@oktetlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB3898160CB29751CCFC9A1EFF9F149@DM6PR11MB3898.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 7/13/21 12:38 PM, Zhang, AlvinX wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2021 3:55 PM
>> To: Zhang, AlvinX <alvinx.zhang@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
>> <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Singh, Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ethdev: add IPv4 and L4 checksum RSS offload types
>>
>> On 7/13/21 4:13 AM, Alvin Zhang wrote:
>>> This patch defines new RSS offload types for IPv4 and
>>> L4(TCP/UDP/SCTP) checksum, which are required when users want to
>>> distribute packets based on the IPv4 or L4 checksum field.
>>>
>>> For example "flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / end actions
>>> rss types ipv4-chksum end queues end / end", this flow causes all
>>> matching packets to be distributed to queues on basis of IPv4
>>> checksum.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alvin Zhang <alvinx.zhang@intel.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
>>
>> I've failed to find mail where I've added the tag. I've replied with "LGTM" for v2
>> which has IPv4 checksum only and many comments on L4 checksum added in v3.
>> So, I think it is incorrect to inherit "LGTM" as Reviewed-by.
>>
>
> I'll correct it at next version.
>
>>> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
>>> Acked-by: Aman Deep Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> v3: Add L4 checksum RSS offload type
>>> v4: Add doc and help string, update commit log
>>> ---
>>> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 12 +++++++++---
>>> app/test-pmd/config.c | 2 ++
>>> lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 2 ++
>>> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c index
>>> 0268b18..93543d8 100644
>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>> @@ -2254,6 +2254,10 @@ struct cmd_config_rss {
>>> rss_conf.rss_hf = ETH_RSS_ECPRI;
>>> else if (!strcmp(res->value, "mpls"))
>>> rss_conf.rss_hf = ETH_RSS_MPLS;
>>> + else if (!strcmp(res->value, "ipv4-chksum"))
>>> + rss_conf.rss_hf = ETH_RSS_IPV4_CHKSUM;
>>> + else if (!strcmp(res->value, "l4-chksum"))
>>> + rss_conf.rss_hf = ETH_RSS_L4_CHKSUM;
>>> else if (!strcmp(res->value, "none"))
>>> rss_conf.rss_hf = 0;
>>> else if (!strcmp(res->value, "level-default")) { @@ -2325,7 +2329,7
>>> @@ struct cmd_config_rss {
>>> .help_str = "port config all rss "
>>> "all|default|eth|vlan|ip|tcp|udp|sctp|ether|port|vxlan|geneve|"
>>>
>> "nvgre|vxlan-gpe|l2tpv3|esp|ah|pfcp|ecpri|mpls|none|level-default|"
>>> - "level-outer|level-inner|<flowtype_id>",
>>> + "level-outer|level-inner|ipv4-chksum|l4-chksum|<flowtype_id>",
>>> .tokens = {
>>> (void *)&cmd_config_rss_port,
>>> (void *)&cmd_config_rss_keyword,
>>> @@ -2438,7 +2442,8 @@ struct cmd_config_rss_hash_key {
>>> "ipv6-tcp-ex#ipv6-udp-ex#"
>>> "l3-src-only#l3-dst-only#l4-src-only#l4-dst-only#"
>>> "l2-src-only#l2-dst-only#s-vlan#c-vlan#"
>>> - "l2tpv3#esp#ah#pfcp#pppoe#gtpu#ecpri#mpls");
>>> + "l2tpv3#esp#ah#pfcp#pppoe#gtpu#ecpri#mpls#"
>>> + "ipv4-chksum#l4-chksum");
>>> cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_config_rss_hash_key_value =
>>> TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_config_rss_hash_key, key, NULL);
>>>
>>> @@ -2451,7 +2456,8 @@ struct cmd_config_rss_hash_key {
>>> "l2-payload|ipv6-ex|ipv6-tcp-ex|ipv6-udp-ex|"
>>> "l3-src-only|l3-dst-only|l4-src-only|l4-dst-only|"
>>> "l2-src-only|l2-dst-only|s-vlan|c-vlan|"
>>> - "l2tpv3|esp|ah|pfcp|pppoe|gtpu|ecpri|mpls "
>>> + "l2tpv3|esp|ah|pfcp|pppoe|gtpu|ecpri|mpls|"
>>> + "ipv4-chksum|l4-chksum "
>>> "<string of hex digits (variable length, NIC dependent)>",
>>> .tokens = {
>>> (void *)&cmd_config_rss_hash_key_port, diff --git
>>> a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c index 43c79b5..14968bf
>>> 100644
>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
>>> @@ -140,6 +140,8 @@
>>> { "gtpu", ETH_RSS_GTPU },
>>> { "ecpri", ETH_RSS_ECPRI },
>>> { "mpls", ETH_RSS_MPLS },
>>> + { "ipv4-chksum", ETH_RSS_IPV4_CHKSUM },
>>> + { "l4-chksum", ETH_RSS_L4_CHKSUM },
>>> { NULL, 0 },
>>> };
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h index
>>> faf3bd9..63b0321 100644
>>> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
>>> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
>>> @@ -537,6 +537,8 @@ struct rte_eth_rss_conf {
>>> #define ETH_RSS_PPPOE (1ULL << 31)
>>> #define ETH_RSS_ECPRI (1ULL << 32)
>>> #define ETH_RSS_MPLS (1ULL << 33)
>>> +#define ETH_RSS_IPV4_CHKSUM (1ULL << 34)
>>> +#define ETH_RSS_L4_CHKSUM (1ULL << 35) /* TCP/UDP/SCTP */
>>
>> It does not reply on my questions at all.
Above list of Layer 4 protocols does not say if the flag may
be reported when all above protocols are supported or some
protocols are supported only.
Also I had a question about UDP checksum 0 since it could be
treated in a different ways since logically it is no checksum
at all.
> You have said:
>>>> I don't think so. IMHO, it should report all RSS capabilities
>>>> regardless generic vs flow API RSS action.
>>>
>> May be it is OK to report subset in
>> dev_info->flow_type_rss_offloads, but I'm very uncomfortable with the
>> approach. Superset sounds more logical to me, but has drawbacks as
>> well.
>
> Here I have another question:
> There are flow type definition and RSS offload type definition,
> #define RTE_ETH_FLOW_RAW 1
> #define RTE_ETH_FLOW_IPV4 2
> #define RTE_ETH_FLOW_FRAG_IPV4 3
> #define RTE_ETH_FLOW_NONFRAG_IPV4_TCP 4
>
> #define ETH_RSS_IPV4 (1ULL << 2)
> #define ETH_RSS_FRAG_IPV4 (1ULL << 3)
> #define ETH_RSS_NONFRAG_IPV4_TCP (1ULL << 4)
>
> are they the different expressions of the same concept?
Sorry, but I don't understand the question.
>
> If yes, why they have been decoupled by the commit: fce6b66893.
Do you mean that motivation in the changeset description is not
clear?
> Then what the flow type of ETH_RSS_PORT, it's UDP, TCP, or SCTP?
I have no answer to the question as well. That's why I'm trying
to avoid it in the patch.
>
> If not, the PMDs can report supported RSS flow type by dev_info->flow_type_rss_offloads,
> but have no way to report supported RSS offload types.
Sorry, don't understand.
>>
>> Nack
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-13 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-03 3:12 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add RSS offload type for L3 checksum Alvin Zhang
2021-06-03 7:14 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-06-03 7:28 ` Zhang, AlvinX
2021-06-03 8:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ethdev: add IPv4 checksum RSS offload type Alvin Zhang
2021-06-03 8:17 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-06-04 2:23 ` Zhang, AlvinX
2021-06-07 18:31 ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-06-15 8:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] ethdev: add IPv4 and L4 checksum RSS offload types Alvin Zhang
2021-06-15 8:26 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-16 15:18 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2021-06-22 8:20 ` Singh, Aman Deep
2021-07-01 14:26 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-06 6:14 ` Zhang, AlvinX
2021-07-06 7:05 ` Zhang, AlvinX
2021-07-06 7:18 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2021-07-06 8:04 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-07 3:23 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2021-07-07 9:49 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-07 13:00 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2021-07-07 13:10 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-08 1:07 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2021-07-08 7:45 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-10 8:38 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-13 1:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Alvin Zhang
2021-07-13 7:54 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-13 9:38 ` Zhang, AlvinX
2021-07-13 10:24 ` Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2021-07-14 2:38 ` Zhang, AlvinX
2021-08-18 2:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Alvin Zhang
2021-08-29 12:07 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2021-08-31 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Alvin Zhang
2021-08-31 9:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] " Alvin Zhang
2021-09-06 0:28 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2021-09-14 14:00 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-09-15 1:36 ` Zhang, AlvinX
2021-09-15 5:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] " Alvin Zhang
2021-09-21 8:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-09-28 13:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-09-29 2:27 ` Zhang, AlvinX
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40d6213e-2d8f-fc95-a3ef-4c5a2a4616e9@oktetlabs.ru \
--to=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=alvinx.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).