From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Zhang, Roy Fan" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>,
"Singh, Jasvinder" <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: announce ABI change of struct rte_port_source_params and rte_port_sink_params
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 20:28:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41993039.3oY5XAlVDj@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7134797.PeUvHm5xl4@xps13>
2016-07-27 12:42, Thomas Monjalon:
> 2016-07-27 10:08, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> > As Thomas mentioned, today is probably the last day to discuss ABI changes. This one is pretty small and straightforward, any issues with it?
> >
> > Panu had a concern that the change from "char *" to "const char *" is too small to be regarded as ABI breakage and we should simply go ahead and do it. My conservative proposal was to put a notice anyway.
> >
> > Nonetheless, what I would like to get from Thomas and Panu is a path forward for this now:
> > a) If we agree to consider this an ABI change, please merge the notice for 16.7;
>
> Panu was noticing 3 things (and I agree with them):
> - it is an API change
> - they can be grouped in only one list item
> - it is better to wait having more changes to break an API
>
> About the third point, in this specific case, I think it is acceptable because:
> - it should not break the ABI
> - the impact of the API change is really small
> - I'm not sure the packet framework should be considered as a DPDK API.
>
> > b) If we agree this is too small for an ABI change, please let us agree now
> > to accept our quick patch for 16.11 for this change.
>
> For an API deprecation notice (reworded),
> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Applied, thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-28 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-16 13:18 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] doc: announce ABI change of struct rte_port_source_params Fan Zhang
2016-05-16 13:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] " Fan Zhang
2016-05-16 13:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] doc: announce ABI change of struct rte_port_sink_params Fan Zhang
2016-05-16 13:57 ` Panu Matilainen
2016-05-19 14:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: announce ABI change of struct rte_port_source_params and rte_port_sink_params Fan Zhang
2016-07-27 10:08 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2016-07-27 10:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-28 18:28 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41993039.3oY5XAlVDj@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jasvinder.singh@intel.com \
--cc=pmatilai@redhat.com \
--cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).