From: "Chen, Jing D" <jing.d.chen@intel.com>
To: "Wang, Xiao W" <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] implement new Rx checksum flag
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 05:41:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4341B239C0EFF9468EE453F9E9F4604D3A2EA632@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473125252-32201-1-git-send-email-xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang, Xiao W
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 9:27 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Chen, Jing D <jing.d.chen@intel.com>; olivier.matz@6wind.com; Wang, Xiao W
> <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] implement new Rx checksum flag
>
> v2:
> * Removed hw_ip_checksum check in fm10k_rx_vec_condition_check().
>
> * Defined CKSUM_SHIFT for SSE bits shift.
>
> * Changed commit title from "add back Rx checksum offload" to
> "fix Rx checksum flags".
>
> * Added new cksum flag support for ixgbe vector Rx, based on patch
> (http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/14630/) which came earlier.
>
> v1:
> Following http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/14941/, this patch set
> implements newly defined Rx checksum flag for igb, ixgbe, i40e and fm10k.
>
> Currently, ixgbe and fm10k support Rx checksum offload in both scalar
> and vector datapath, while the other two don't, this patch set keeps
> this situation.
>
> Note: This patch set has dependency on the following patches:
>
> "mbuf: add new Rx checksum mbuf flags"
> (http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/14941/)
>
> "ixgbe: support checksum flags in sse vector Rx function"
> (http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/14630/)
>
> Xiao Wang (5):
> net/fm10k: fix Rx checksum flags
> net/fm10k: implement new Rx checksum flag
> net/e1000: implement new Rx checksum flag
> net/ixgbe: implement new Rx checksum flag
> net/i40e: implement new Rx checksum flag
>
> drivers/net/e1000/igb_rxtx.c | 4 +++-
> drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 6 ++++++
> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 4 +++-
> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 6 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Acked-by : Jing Chen <jing.d.chen@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-14 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-06 1:27 Xiao Wang
2016-09-06 1:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] net/fm10k: fix Rx checksum flags Xiao Wang
2016-09-06 1:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] net/fm10k: implement new Rx checksum flag Xiao Wang
2016-09-06 1:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] net/e1000: " Xiao Wang
2016-09-06 1:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] net/ixgbe: " Xiao Wang
2016-09-06 1:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] net/i40e: " Xiao Wang
2016-09-14 5:41 ` Chen, Jing D [this message]
2016-10-13 23:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] " Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4341B239C0EFF9468EE453F9E9F4604D3A2EA632@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=jing.d.chen@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).