From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
Cc: "david.marchand@6wind.com" <david.marchand@6wind.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, "nhorman@tuxdriver.com" <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] drivers: prefix driver REGISTER macro with RTE PMD
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2016 21:50:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4525292.xovB97rfbE@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB5PR0401MB205405EE94FDB4A25437138290D80@DB5PR0401MB2054.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
2016-10-09 15:12, Shreyansh Jain:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > 2016-10-08 23:35, Shreyansh Jain:
> > > +PMDINFO_TO_O = if grep -E 'RTE_PMD_REGISTER_PCI\([0-9a-zA-Z,_\.
> > ]+\)|RTE_PMD_REGISTER_VDEV\([0-9a-zA-Z,_\. ]+\)' $<;\
> > > + then \
> >
> > I don't understand why you don't simply grep 'RTE_PMD_REGISTER_.*(' ?
>
> Because I want to make sure that the grep matches only the DRIVER registration functions.
> In case a new macro (or driver type) is added in future, this macro can be updated. This way we can reduce the probability of a faulty match.
>
> Is there a problem with closest possible match?
It is just long and useless. A macro starting with RTE_PMD_REGISTER_ must
be called from a PMD. What else?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-09 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-07 13:33 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eal/drivers: prefix driver REGISTER macros with EAL Shreyansh Jain
2016-10-07 13:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] eal/drivers: prefix VDEV driver REGISTER macro " Shreyansh Jain
2016-10-07 13:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] eal/drivers: prefix driver param " Shreyansh Jain
2016-10-07 13:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eal/drivers: prefix driver REGISTER macros " Shreyansh Jain
2016-10-07 13:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-07 14:18 ` Neil Horman
2016-10-08 13:01 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-10-08 13:00 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-10-10 12:56 ` Neil Horman
2016-10-11 6:36 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-10-11 7:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-11 13:38 ` Neil Horman
2016-10-11 13:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-11 14:57 ` Neil Horman
2016-10-12 4:29 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-10-07 13:45 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-08 12:47 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-10-17 13:09 ` Neil Horman
2016-10-08 18:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] drivers: prefix driver REGISTER macro with RTE EAL Shreyansh Jain
2016-10-08 18:02 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-10-08 18:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] drivers: prefix driver REGISTER macro with RTE PMD Shreyansh Jain
2016-10-08 20:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-09 15:12 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-10-09 19:50 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2016-10-10 5:11 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-10-10 5:16 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-10-10 5:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Shreyansh Jain
2016-10-13 23:45 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4525292.xovB97rfbE@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=david.marchand@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=shreyansh.jain@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).