DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Gowrishankar <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] kni: add new mbuf in alloc_q only based on its empty slots
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 18:20:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ca53d20-a36a-f769-fefe-1619bd1a36af@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1494503486-20876-1-git-send-email-gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 5/11/2017 12:51 PM, Gowrishankar wrote:
> From: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> In kni_allocate_mbufs(), we attempt to add max_burst (32) count of mbuf
> always into alloc_q, which is excessively leading too many rte_pktmbuf_
> free() when alloc_q is contending at high packet rate (for eg 10Gig data).
> In a situation when alloc_q fifo can only accommodate very few (or zero)
> mbuf, create only what needed and add in fifo.
> 
> With this patch, we could stop random network stall in KNI at higher packet
> rate (eg 1G or 10G data between vEth0 and PMD) sufficiently exhausting
> alloc_q on above condition. I tested i40e PMD for this purpose in ppc64le.
> 
> Changes:
>  v2 - alloc_q free count calculation corrected.
>       line wrap fixed for commit message.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-06-07 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-11 11:29 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Gowrishankar
2017-05-11 11:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Gowrishankar
2017-05-16 17:15   ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-05-18 17:45     ` gowrishankar muthukrishnan
2017-05-31 16:21       ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-06-01  5:56         ` gowrishankar muthukrishnan
2017-06-01  9:18           ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-06-06 14:43             ` gowrishankar muthukrishnan
2017-06-07 17:20               ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-06-07 17:20   ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2017-07-01 10:56     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ca53d20-a36a-f769-fefe-1619bd1a36af@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).