From: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
To: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] ip_chksum not updated in ipsec-secgw application
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 14:57:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ff03933-ba75-87d4-84ec-320160c0a60f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82bd976f-7482-924f-a50a-649bd63d4d65@nxp.com>
On 18/07/2016 14:53, Akhil Goyal wrote:
> On 7/18/2016 6:50 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 2016-07-18 13:57, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy:
>>> On 18/07/2016 13:41, Akhil Goyal wrote:
>>>> In Ipsec-secgw application, while adding the outer IP header,
>>>> it seems that the application does not update the checksum value
>>>> for outbound packets. This result in incorrect ip->checksum in
>>>> the encrypted packet.
>> [...]
>>>
>>> It is intentional. The application is using IP checksum offload
>>
>> The correct behaviour is to have a software fallback (using rte_ip.h)
>> for drivers which do not support checksum offload.
>> But given it is just an example, it is normal to have this kind of
>> constraint. However I think it should be explained in its doc.
>> And a list of tested NICs would be nice to have.
>>
> Agreed. The driver that I was using did not enable checksum offload.
> It is good to have a fallback option.
>
That's a good point.
So would it be enough to call out in the sample app guide that we use IP
checksum offload and
show a warning in case the Driver does not support such offload?
Sergio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-18 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-18 12:41 Akhil Goyal
2016-07-18 12:57 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2016-07-18 13:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-18 13:53 ` Akhil Goyal
2016-07-18 13:57 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy [this message]
2016-07-18 14:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-18 14:25 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2016-07-18 13:49 ` Akhil Goyal
2016-07-18 14:00 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ff03933-ba75-87d4-84ec-320160c0a60f@intel.com \
--to=sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).