From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Kantecki, Tomasz" <tomasz.kantecki@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: Initial implementation of PQoS EAL extension
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:22:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5212003.dKKWlXxaE8@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E79CF84CF47B0B42B66F4F5835125F9C817B2425@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
2016-02-22 13:12, Kantecki, Tomasz:
> Off the mail list, we received feedback that extending EAL commands is not an option due to Intel Architecture nature of CAT.
> Consequently, we changed direction when working on V2 PQoS patches in roder to:
> - reduce DPDK PQoS code print and reuse existing open source code
> - remove IA specific options from EAL
>
> Current V2 patch, yet to be shared on the mail-list in a few days, implements a sample code (reuse of skeleton) that links against existing 01.org PQoS library. This eliminates need for code included in V1 librte_pqos patch.
> The same sample code implements a C module that parses application specific part of the command line with CAT configuration options (same format as V1 EAL command). The module is easy to re-use in other applications as needed.
> In the future, if there is a need to change this C module into a regular DPDK library then we'll be happy to do so.
>
> Are you OK with concept behind V2 PQoS patch as described above?
So you mean that PQoS don't really need some DPDK integration?
You just want to show how to use it with DPDK?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-22 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-22 13:12 Kantecki, Tomasz
2016-02-22 13:22 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2016-02-23 10:03 ` Kantecki, Tomasz
2016-02-23 16:41 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-23 23:03 ` Kantecki, Tomasz
2016-02-24 8:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-24 10:10 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-02-24 10:22 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-02-24 10:34 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-24 11:21 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-02-24 11:45 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-24 13:47 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-02-24 10:31 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-24 11:00 ` Bruce Richardson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-02-24 15:14 Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-02-24 16:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-01-29 13:29 Wojciech Andralojc
2016-02-16 16:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5212003.dKKWlXxaE8@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=tomasz.kantecki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).