DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] mbuf: rename in_port to just port
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:45:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <540D6C93.3080206@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409240559-14447-6-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com>



On 08/28/2014 05:42 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> In some cases we may want to tag a packet for a particular destination
> or output port, so rename the "in_port" field in the mbuf to just "port"
> so that it can be re-used for this purpose if an application needs it.
> 
> Changes in V2:
> * Further updates to apply to latest HEAD on master
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-09-08  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-27 15:50 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] Mbuf structure Rework, part 1 Bruce Richardson
2014-08-27 15:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] ixgbe: put only non-zero initializer in definition Bruce Richardson
2014-08-27 15:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/6] mbuf: rename RTE_MBUF_SCATTER_GATHER into RTE_MBUF_REFCNT Bruce Richardson
2014-08-27 15:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/6] mbuf: remove rte_ctrlmbuf Bruce Richardson
2014-08-27 15:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/6] mbuf: remove the rte_pktmbuf structure Bruce Richardson
2014-08-27 15:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/6] mbuf: rename in_port to just port Bruce Richardson
2014-08-27 15:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/6] mbuf: flatten struct vlan_macip into mbuf struct Bruce Richardson
2014-08-28 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] Mbuf structure Rework, part 1 Bruce Richardson
2014-09-17  9:30   ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-08-28 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] ixgbe: put only non-zero initializer in definition Bruce Richardson
2014-09-05 16:14   ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2014-09-08  7:55   ` Olivier MATZ
2014-08-28 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] mbuf: rename RTE_MBUF_SCATTER_GATHER into RTE_MBUF_REFCNT Bruce Richardson
2014-09-05 16:14   ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2014-09-08  8:01   ` Olivier MATZ
2014-08-28 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] mbuf: remove rte_ctrlmbuf Bruce Richardson
2014-09-05 16:15   ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2014-09-08  8:21   ` Olivier MATZ
2014-09-09  8:48     ` Richardson, Bruce
2014-08-28 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] mbuf: remove the rte_pktmbuf structure Bruce Richardson
2014-09-04 13:25   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Bruce Richardson
2014-09-05 16:17     ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2014-09-08  8:29     ` Olivier MATZ
2014-09-05 16:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2014-08-28 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] mbuf: rename in_port to just port Bruce Richardson
2014-09-05 16:16   ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2014-09-08  8:45   ` Olivier MATZ [this message]
2014-08-28 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] mbuf: flatten struct vlan_macip into mbuf struct Bruce Richardson
2014-09-05 16:21   ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2014-09-07 19:40     ` Richardson, Bruce
2014-09-08  9:07   ` Olivier MATZ
2014-09-09 14:40     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Bruce Richardson
2014-09-09 15:20       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2014-09-08 12:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] Mbuf structure Rework, part 1 Olivier MATZ
2014-09-09  9:03   ` Richardson, Bruce

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=540D6C93.3080206@6wind.com \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).