From: "Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio" <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] mk: remove combined library and related options
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 09:33:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55263955.1070707@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150408112619.14596b65@urahara>
On 08/04/2015 19:26, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:07:21 +0100
> Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Currently, the target/rules to build combined libraries is different
>> than the one to build individual libraries.
>>
>> By removing the combined library option as a build configuration option
>> we simplify the build pocess by having a single point for linking/archiving
>> libraries in DPDK.
>>
>> This patch removes CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_COMBINE_LIB build config option and
>> removes the makefiles associated with building a combined library.
>>
>> The CONFIG_RTE_LIBNAME config option is kept as it will be use to
>> always generate a linker script that acts as a single combined library.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
> No. We use combined library and it greatly simplfies the application
> linking process.
>
After all the opposition this patch had in v2, I did explain the current
issues
(see http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-March/015366.html ) and this
was the agreed solution.
As I mention in the cover letter (also see patch 2/5), building DPDK
(after applying this patch series) will always generate a very simple
linker script that behaves as a combined library.
I encourage you to apply this patch series and try to build your app
(which links against combined lib).
Your app should build without problem unless I messed up somewhere and
it needs fixing.
Sergio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-09 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-08 15:07 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] Enhance build process Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2015-04-08 15:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] mk: remove combined library and related options Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2015-04-08 18:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-04-09 8:33 ` Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio [this message]
2015-04-09 9:06 ` Avi Kivity
2015-04-09 9:42 ` Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
2015-04-09 11:19 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-09 13:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-09 13:47 ` Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
2015-04-09 17:00 ` Avi Kivity
2015-04-09 20:34 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-13 9:52 ` Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
2015-04-13 11:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-13 11:23 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-08 15:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] mk: always generate combined lib linker script Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2015-04-08 15:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/5] lib: set LDLIBS for each library Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2015-04-08 15:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/5] mk: use LDLIBS when linking shared libraries Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2015-04-08 15:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/5] mk: update LDLIBS for app building Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55263955.1070707@intel.com \
--to=sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).