DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio" <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@cloudius-systems.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] mk: remove combined library and related options
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 10:42:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5526496F.6080201@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55264127.2020604@cloudius-systems.com>

On 09/04/2015 10:06, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>
> On 04/09/2015 11:33 AM, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
>> On 08/04/2015 19:26, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> On Wed,  8 Apr 2015 16:07:21 +0100
>>> Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Currently, the target/rules to build combined libraries is different
>>>> than the one to build individual libraries.
>>>>
>>>> By removing the combined library option as a build configuration 
>>>> option
>>>> we simplify the build pocess by having a single point for 
>>>> linking/archiving
>>>> libraries in DPDK.
>>>>
>>>> This patch removes CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_COMBINE_LIB build config option 
>>>> and
>>>> removes the makefiles associated with building a combined library.
>>>>
>>>> The CONFIG_RTE_LIBNAME config option is kept as it will be use to
>>>> always generate a linker script that acts as a single combined 
>>>> library.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy 
>>>> <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
>>> No. We use combined library and it greatly simplfies the application
>>> linking process.
>>>
>> After all the opposition this patch had in v2, I did explain the 
>> current issues
>> (see http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-March/015366.html ) and 
>> this was the agreed solution.
>>
>> As I mention in the cover letter (also see patch 2/5), building DPDK 
>> (after applying this patch series) will always generate a very simple 
>> linker script that behaves as a combined library.
>> I encourage you to apply this patch series and try to build your app 
>> (which links against combined lib).
>> Your app should build without problem unless I messed up somewhere 
>> and it needs fixing.
>
> Is it possible to generate a pkgconfig file (dpdk.pc) that contains 
> all of the setting needed to compile and link with dpdk? That will 
> greatly simplify usage.
>
> A linker script is just too esoteric.
>
>
That sounds very interesting.

I would be in favor of dropping the linker script for this solution if 
everybody is happy with it.

Sergio

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-09  9:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-08 15:07 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] Enhance build process Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2015-04-08 15:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] mk: remove combined library and related options Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2015-04-08 18:26   ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-04-09  8:33     ` Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
2015-04-09  9:06       ` Avi Kivity
2015-04-09  9:42         ` Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio [this message]
2015-04-09 11:19         ` Neil Horman
2015-04-09 13:33           ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-09 13:47             ` Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
2015-04-09 17:00           ` Avi Kivity
2015-04-09 20:34             ` Neil Horman
2015-04-13  9:52               ` Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
2015-04-13 11:04                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-13 11:23                   ` Neil Horman
2015-04-08 15:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] mk: always generate combined lib linker script Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2015-04-08 15:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/5] lib: set LDLIBS for each library Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2015-04-08 15:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/5] mk: use LDLIBS when linking shared libraries Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2015-04-08 15:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/5] mk: update LDLIBS for app building Sergio Gonzalez Monroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5526496F.6080201@intel.com \
    --to=sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com \
    --cc=avi@cloudius-systems.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).