DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: "Adrien Mazarguil" <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
	"Nélio Laranjeiro" <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: poll completion queue once per a call
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:26:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55700E85-9A8D-419A-AE1A-63EBB26B0F18@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cfdb1356-9fc6-f4ec-34c6-3ec1ff571207@grimberg.me>


> On Jul 27, 2017, at 4:12 AM, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> wrote:
> 
> 
>>> Yes I realize that, but can't the device still complete in a burst (of
>>> unsuppressed completions)? I mean its not guaranteed that for every
>>> txq_complete a signaled completion is pending right? What happens if
>>> the device has inconsistent completion pacing? Can't the sw grow a
>>> batch of completions if txq_complete will process a single completion
>>> unconditionally?
>> Speculation. First of all, device doesn't delay completion notifications for no
>> reason. ASIC is not a SW running on top of a OS.
> 
> I'm sorry but this statement is not correct. It might be correct in a
> lab environment, but in practice, there are lots of things that can
> affect the device timing.
Disagree.

[...]
> Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Thanks for ack!

Yongseok

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-28  0:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-20 15:48 Yongseok Koh
2017-07-20 16:34 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-07-21 15:10   ` Yongseok Koh
2017-07-23  9:49     ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-07-25  7:43       ` Yongseok Koh
2017-07-27 11:12         ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-07-28  0:26           ` Yongseok Koh [this message]
2017-07-31 16:12 ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55700E85-9A8D-419A-AE1A-63EBB26B0F18@mellanox.com \
    --to=yskoh@mellanox.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).