DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Jay Rolette <rolette@infiniteio.com>
Cc: DPDK <dev@dpdk.org>, David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>,
	Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>,
	Remy Horton <remy.horton@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] Use common Linux tools to control DPDK ports
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:00:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E750AB.3040707@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADNuJVpr_0eOj8KW1fH5_-ed-6=si-Xsgjffcitd5CtVA8Qz9Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/14/2016 5:40 PM, Jay Rolette wrote:
> Is there some technical reason or is it just the push-back you are
> getting from some of the maintainers?
> 
The majority of the discussion on the list was based on not having
kernel modules, which cloud the desired technical discussion.

As a result of the opposition, we will give a try to upstreaming and I
will be able to use some of my time to work on this.

If KCP can be upstreamed, this is good for everybody, if not I hope we
can discuss again in community the future of the feature.

And during this process, userspace counterpart in DPDK will be missing,
and kernel part will be in a form of patch for head of latest kernel, so
not sure how community will be able to test this.

> I chimed in on one of the other threads already, but I'm extremely
> disappointed that usability and serviceability improvements to existing
> DPDK capabilities (KNI) are getting blocked like this.
> 
> For companies building network appliances based on DPDK, having a kernel
> module that isn't in the tree just isn't that big of a deal. Long term
> goals for getting this upstream are great, but why not take advantage of
> incremental improvements in the meantime?
> 
> Jay 
> 
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com
> <mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 3/9/2016 11:41 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>     > This patch sent to keep record of latest status of the work.
>     >
>     >
>     > This work is to make DPDK ports more visible and to enable using common
>     > Linux tools to configure DPDK ports.
>     >
>     > Patch is based on KNI but contains only control functionality of it,
>     > also this patch does not include any Linux kernel network driver as
>     > part of it.
>     >
>     > Basically with the help of a kernel module (KCP), virtual Linux network
>     > interfaces named as "dpdk$" are created per DPDK port, control messages
>     > sent to these virtual interfaces are forwarded to DPDK, and response
>     > sent back to Linux application.
>     >
>     > Virtual interfaces created when DPDK application started and destroyed
>     > automatically when DPDK application terminated.
>     >
>     > Communication between kernel-space and DPDK done using netlink socket.
>     >
>     > In long term this patch intends to replace the KNI and KNI will be
>     > depreciated.
>     >
> 
>     Self-NACK: Will work on netdev to upstream this.
> 
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2016-03-15  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1453911849-16562-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
2016-01-27 16:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] kcp: add kernel control path kernel module Ferruh Yigit
2016-01-28  9:49   ` Remy Horton
2016-01-28 13:50     ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-28 15:34   ` Avi Kivity
2016-02-28 20:16     ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-29  9:43       ` Avi Kivity
2016-02-29 10:43         ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-29 10:58           ` Avi Kivity
2016-02-29 11:06             ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-29 11:35               ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-29 15:05                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-29 15:19                 ` Panu Matilainen
2016-02-29 15:27                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-29 16:04                     ` Panu Matilainen
2016-02-29 14:33               ` Jay Rolette
2016-03-01 22:40                 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-03-02  2:02                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-02  8:27                   ` Panu Matilainen
2016-03-02 10:47                     ` Vincent JARDIN
2016-03-02 10:51                       ` Jim Thompson
2016-03-02 12:03                         ` Vincent JARDIN
2016-03-02 22:51                           ` Jim Thompson
2016-03-02 11:21                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-02 22:35                         ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-03  8:31                           ` Panu Matilainen
2016-03-03 10:05                             ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-03 10:11                               ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-03 10:51                               ` Panu Matilainen
2016-03-10  0:04                           ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-10  6:31                             ` Vincent JARDIN
2016-03-02 22:18                   ` Jay Rolette
2016-03-03 10:11                     ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-03 16:59                       ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-03 18:18                         ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-29 11:27             ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-29 11:39               ` Avi Kivity
2016-02-29 14:35                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-29 20:11   ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-01  0:35     ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-01-27 16:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] rte_ctrl_if: add control interface library Ferruh Yigit
2016-01-28 11:14   ` Remy Horton
2016-01-28 13:15     ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-01-28 13:24       ` Jay Rolette
2016-01-28 13:56         ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-01-28 13:57       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-01-28 14:22         ` Yigit, Ferruh
2016-01-27 16:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] examples/ethtool: add control interface support to the application Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-12 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Use common Linux tools to control DPDK ports Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-12 13:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] kcp: add kernel control path kernel module Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-12 13:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] rte_ctrl_if: add control interface library Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-17 19:58     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-02-18 10:43       ` Yigit, Ferruh
2016-02-12 13:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] examples/ethtool: add control interface support to the application Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-17 19:39     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-02-18 10:11       ` Yigit, Ferruh
2016-02-26 14:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Use common Linux tools to control DPDK ports Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-26 14:10     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] lib/librte_ethtool: move librte_ethtool form examples to lib folder Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-26 14:10     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] kcp: add kernel control path kernel module Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-01  1:02       ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-01 15:53         ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-26 14:10     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] rte_ctrl_if: add control interface library Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-26 14:10     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] examples/ethtool: add control interface support to the application Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-29  9:33     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Use common Linux tools to control DPDK ports Remy Horton
2016-03-01 15:41     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-01 15:41       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] lib/librte_ethtool: move librte_ethtool form examples to lib folder Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-01 15:41       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] kcp: add kernel control path kernel module Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-01 23:06         ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-02 11:05           ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-01 23:09         ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-01 23:10         ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-02 11:06           ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-01 15:41       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] rte_ctrl_if: add control interface library Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-01 15:42       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] examples/ethtool: add control interface support to the application Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-09 11:41       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] Use common Linux tools to control DPDK ports Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-09 11:41         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] lib/librte_ethtool: move librte_ethtool form examples to lib folder Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-09 11:41         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] kcp: add kernel control path kernel module Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-09 11:41         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] rte_ctrl_if: add control interface library Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-09 11:41         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] examples/ethtool: add control interface support to the application Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-09 12:23           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-03-14 15:31         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] Use common Linux tools to control DPDK ports Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-14 17:40           ` Jay Rolette
2016-03-15  0:00             ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56E750AB.3040707@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=remy.horton@intel.com \
    --cc=rolette@infiniteio.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).