From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Cc: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
zhouyangchao <zhouyates@gmail.com>,
dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: unregister an unregisterd net_device could cause a kernel crash
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 09:57:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5748392.LeAesWsqIn@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE2025F5119@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
2016-09-09 14:33, Mcnamara, John:
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> > 2016-09-08 18:15, Ferruh Yigit:
> > > On 9/8/2016 5:44 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > But then again the whole KNI driver fails completely when running
> > > > kernel style check.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, it generates lots of warnings.
> > > I can fix them (excluding ethtool/*), that wouldn't take much time but
> > > how syntax only patches welcomed? Another concern is it trashes git
> > blame.
> >
> > You ask a question and give the answer ;) I think it depends just on the
> > balance of the pros/cons - to be evaluated.
>
> Hi,
>
> I think in general we would prefer to avoid any large scale code beautification since, as pointed out, it breaks the option to git blame.
>
> However, in the case of the KNI code the main author in git is "Intel" so git blame doesn't tell you a lot. Also, Ferruh is the maintainer, has made most of the recent changes, and is actively maintaining/improving it. So I think if the syntax fix came from him it would be okay. At least it would allow us to apply the checkpatch checks.
Yes seems reasonnable
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-10 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-09 2:46 zhouyangchao
2016-09-08 16:44 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-09-08 17:15 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-09-09 12:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-09-09 14:33 ` Mcnamara, John
2016-09-10 7:57 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2016-09-08 17:07 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-09-11 9:59 ` zhouyangchao
2016-09-13 13:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-09-21 16:41 ` Thomas Monjalon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-09-09 2:42 zhouyangchao
2016-09-08 16:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5748392.LeAesWsqIn@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=zhouyates@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).