DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "johndale@cisco.com" <johndale@cisco.com>,
	"Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>,
	"adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com" <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
	"rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com" <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>,
	"alejandro.lucero@netronome.com" <alejandro.lucero@netronome.com>,
	"sony.chacko@qlogic.com" <sony.chacko@qlogic.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mbuf: new flag when Vlan is stripped
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:34:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <575FCFA8.7030704@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836B707E8@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>



On 06/14/2016 11:15 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>>>> If we decide to generalize the ixgbe behavior for all PMDs for this
>>>> flag, it will break the applications relying on this flag but with
>>>> other PMDs. So for the same reason we added a new PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED
>>>> we cannot change the behavior of an existing flag.
>>>
>>> Ok, then let's make PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED == PKT_RX_VLAN,
>>> and assign new value to the  PKT_RX_VLAN.
>>> Or have PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED == PKT_RX_VLAN and create a new one:
>>> PKT_RX_VLAN_PRESENT or so.
>>> ?
>>>
>>
>> I think adding this new flag/packet_type is a new feature,
>> because only ixgbe was behaving like this, and this was not
>> documented. To me, marking the old flag as deprecated is
>> a good compromise to keep the application relying on this
>> working. If you feel the term "deprecated" is not adapted,
>> we could reword it to something weaker.
>
> Yes, that would do I think.
> Basically my only concern that we will mark it as deprecated,
> and then will remove it (as it is deprecated), without providing
> anything new to replace it.
>
>>
>> We should try to not stay in that state too long,
>
> Agree.
>
>> and anybody willing to implement this feature would be welcome. For my
>> part, this is not something I plan to do yet.
>>
>
> Ok, we'll see what we can do for 16.11.
> But no hard promises right now either :)

Great, thanks :)
I'll send an update of the patch taking your comments in
account.

Olivier

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-14  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-21 23:36 [dpdk-dev] PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT when VLAN stripping is disabled John Daley (johndale)
2016-04-25 12:02 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-04-25 13:50   ` Olivier Matz
2016-04-25 16:17     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-04-26  0:16     ` John Daley (johndale)
2016-04-28 14:43       ` Olivier MATZ
2016-05-10 16:24         ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC] mbuf: new flag when vlan is stripped Olivier Matz
2016-05-12 20:36           ` John Daley (johndale)
2016-05-23  7:59             ` Olivier Matz
2016-05-23  8:46           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: new flag when Vlan " Olivier Matz
2016-05-23  8:59             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-05-23  9:12               ` Olivier Matz
2016-05-23  9:23                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-05-23  9:38                   ` Olivier Matz
2016-05-23  9:20             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-05-23  9:40               ` Olivier Matz
2016-05-27 14:33             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Olivier Matz
2016-06-13 11:41               ` Olivier Matz
2016-06-13 14:42               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-13 16:07                 ` Olivier Matz
2016-06-13 16:31                   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-14  8:32                     ` Olivier MATZ
2016-06-14  9:15                       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-14  9:34                         ` Olivier MATZ [this message]
2016-06-15 11:48               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Olivier Matz
2016-06-15 12:33                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-15 15:20                   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=575FCFA8.7030704@6wind.com \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=alejandro.lucero@netronome.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=johndale@cisco.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com \
    --cc=sony.chacko@qlogic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).