DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zyta Szpak <zr@semihalf.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: remy.horton@intel.com, wenzhuo.lu@intel.com,
	helin.zhang@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com,
	jingjing.wu@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] ethdev: remove get_reg_length callback
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:05:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5772A04A.9000805@semihalf.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2151797.UCVmFz2S8u@xps13>

OK

On 27.06.2016 17:19, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-06-23 15:26, zr@semihalf.com:
>> From: Zyta Szpak <zr@semihalf.com>
>>
>> Version 4 of fixing the assumption of that device registers
>> are always 32 bits long. rte_eth_dev_get_reg_length and
>> rte_eth_dev_get_reg_info callbacks did not provide register size
>> to the app in any way. It is needed to allocate proper number
>> of bytes before retrieving registers content with
>> rte_eth_dev_get_reg. This commit remove rte_eth_dev_get_reg_length
>> callback and adds width parameter to reg_info struct which makes
>> it possible to call rte_eth_dev_get_reg_info to get attributes
>> first. The drivers using this callback fill width and length
>> when call to function made with data=NULL.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zyta Szpak <zr@semihalf.com>
> Please do not mention patch revision in the commit log.
> However you can add a changelog below the three dashes (with --annotate).
> And please use --in-reply-to to keep revisions in the same thread.
> Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-28 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-23 13:26 zr
2016-06-23 13:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] examples/ethtool: use rte_eth_dev_get_reg_info for reg params zr
2016-06-27 10:46   ` Remy Horton
2016-06-27 10:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] ethdev: remove get_reg_length callback Remy Horton
2016-06-28 16:05   ` Zyta Szpak
2016-06-27 15:19 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-06-28 16:05   ` Zyta Szpak [this message]
2016-07-04  6:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " Zyta Szpak
2016-07-04  6:51   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] examples/ethtool: use rte_eth_dev_get_reg_info for reg params Zyta Szpak
2016-07-04 10:39     ` Remy Horton
2016-07-04 10:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] ethdev: remove get_reg_length callback Remy Horton
2016-07-04 11:34     ` Zyta Szpak
2016-07-04 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 " Zyta Szpak
2016-07-04 11:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] examples/ethtool: use rte_eth_dev_get_reg_info for reg params Zyta Szpak
2016-07-04 13:24     ` Remy Horton
2016-07-08 17:02       ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-04 13:24   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] ethdev: remove get_reg_length callback Remy Horton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5772A04A.9000805@semihalf.com \
    --to=zr@semihalf.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=remy.horton@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).