DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shreyansh jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
To: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>, David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 00/15] rte_driver/device infrastructure
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:43:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57839B66.2000604@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160708190945.24225-1-viktorin@rehivetech.com>

Hi Jan,

On Saturday 09 July 2016 12:39 AM, Jan Viktorin wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> based on the discussions with Shreyansh, I propose a patchset with
> the important EAL changes. It is incomplete and I suppose to extend
> and change certain things in the foreseeable future.
> 
> Important notes:
> 
> * pmd_type is removed
> * introduced rte_vdev_driver inheriting rte_driver
> * PMD_REGISTER_DRIVER is replaced by RTE_EAL_VDRV_REGISTER
> * rte_driver/device integrated into rte_pci_driver/device
> * all drivers and devices are in 2 lists - general and bus-specific
> 
> Shreyansh, I hope I do not duplicate your work. I tried to avoid touching
> pmd_type but it quite complicated... There is also an initial generalization
> of rte_pci_resource. More such generalizations are to be done.

My mistake - I didn't even notice this email somehow. In fact, I noticed right when I was about to send the v6 - while searching for my old conversation.
I will look through these patches and remove any conflicting change (as much as possible) - I don't think it there would much conflicts except the VDEV area.
And, cursory look shows not much duplication - don't worry.

> 
> The init/uninit functions cannot be generalized easily, I think. Both PCI
> and VDEV have different requirements.
> 
> No idea about hotplug...
> 
> 
> The patchset is based on (all rebased on top of 34d279):
> 
>  [PATCH v5 00/17] Prepare for rte_device / rte_driver
> 
> 
> Thanks anybody for some quick review and notes.

Added to my list of todo. I will review and reply soon.

> 
> Regards
> Jan

-
Shreyansh

[...]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-07-11 13:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-08 19:09 Jan Viktorin
2016-07-08 19:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 01/15] eal: extract vdev infra Jan Viktorin
2016-07-11 13:29   ` Shreyansh jain
2016-07-11 14:08     ` Jan Viktorin
2016-07-08 19:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 02/15] eal: no need to test for PMD_VDEV anymore Jan Viktorin
2016-07-08 19:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 03/15] eal: do not call init for PMD_PDEV drivers Jan Viktorin
2016-07-08 19:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 04/15] drivers: convert PMD_VDEV drivers to use rte_vdev_driver Jan Viktorin
2016-07-08 19:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 05/15] eal: move init/uninit to rte_vdev_driver Jan Viktorin
2016-07-08 19:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 06/15] eal: remove PMD_REGISTER_DRIVER Jan Viktorin
2016-07-08 19:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 07/15] eal: get rid of pmd_type Jan Viktorin
2016-07-08 19:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 08/15] eal: define macro container_of Jan Viktorin
2016-07-08 19:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 09/15] eal: rte_pci.h includes rte_dev.h Jan Viktorin
2016-07-08 19:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 10/15] eal: rename and move rte_pci_resource Jan Viktorin
2016-07-08 19:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 11/15] eal/pci: inherit rte_driver by rte_pci_driver Jan Viktorin
2016-07-08 19:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 12/15] eal: call rte_eal_driver_register Jan Viktorin
2016-07-08 19:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 13/15] eal: introduce rte_device Jan Viktorin
2016-07-08 19:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 14/15] eal/pci: inherit rte_device by rte_pci_device Jan Viktorin
2016-07-08 19:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 15/15] eal/pci: insert rte_device on scan Jan Viktorin
2016-07-11 13:13 ` Shreyansh jain [this message]
2016-07-15 13:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 00/15] rte_driver/device infrastructure Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-15 15:33   ` Jan Viktorin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57839B66.2000604@nxp.com \
    --to=shreyansh.jain@nxp.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=viktorin@rehivetech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).