From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, yliu@fridaylinux.org, jfreiman@redhat.com,
mst@redhat.com, vkaplans@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/21] vhost: iotlb: add pending miss request list and helpers
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 17:18:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <586f1ce1-d77a-e0ba-5c59-b698bcef4a41@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170905071106.GA22515@debian-ZGViaWFuCg>
On 09/05/2017 09:11 AM, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:50:10AM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>> In order to be able to handle other ports or queues while waiting
>> for an IOTLB miss reply, a pending list is created so that waiter
>> can return and restart later on with sending again a miss request.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> lib/librte_vhost/iotlb.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> lib/librte_vhost/iotlb.h | 4 +++
>> lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/iotlb.c b/lib/librte_vhost/iotlb.c
>> index 1b739dae5..d014bfe98 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/iotlb.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/iotlb.c
>> @@ -49,7 +49,86 @@ struct vhost_iotlb_entry {
>> uint8_t perm;
>> };
>>
>> -#define IOTLB_CACHE_SIZE 1024
>> +#define IOTLB_CACHE_SIZE 2048
>> +
>> +static void vhost_user_iotlb_pending_remove_all(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>> +{
>> + struct vhost_iotlb_entry *node, *temp_node;
>> +
>> + rte_rwlock_write_lock(&vq->iotlb_lock);
>> +
>> + TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(node, &vq->iotlb_pending_list, next, temp_node) {
>> + TAILQ_REMOVE(&vq->iotlb_pending_list, node, next);
>> + rte_mempool_put(vq->iotlb_pool, node);
>> + }
>> +
>> + rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&vq->iotlb_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int vhost_user_iotlb_pending_miss(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, uint64_t iova,
>> + uint8_t perm)
>> +{
>> + struct vhost_iotlb_entry *node;
>> + int found = 0;
>> +
>
> The return value of this function is boolean. So it's better
> to return bool instead of int.
Fixed.
>> + rte_rwlock_read_lock(&vq->iotlb_lock);
>> +
>> + TAILQ_FOREACH(node, &vq->iotlb_pending_list, next) {
>> + if ((node->iova == iova) && (node->perm == perm)) {
>> + found = 1;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&vq->iotlb_lock);
>> +
>> + return found;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void vhost_user_iotlb_pending_insert(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> + uint64_t iova, uint8_t perm)
>> +{
>> + struct vhost_iotlb_entry *node;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = rte_mempool_get(vq->iotlb_pool, (void **)&node);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG, "IOTLB pool empty, invalidate cache\n");
>
> I think The log level should be INFO or the likes, not ERR.
Fixed.
>
>> + vhost_user_iotlb_pending_remove_all(vq);
>> + ret = rte_mempool_get(vq->iotlb_pool, (void **)&node);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG, "IOTLB pool still empty, failure\n");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + node->iova = iova;
>> + node->perm = perm;
>> +
>> + rte_rwlock_write_lock(&vq->iotlb_lock);
>> +
>> + TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&vq->iotlb_pending_list, node, next);
>> +
>> + rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&vq->iotlb_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void vhost_user_iotlb_pending_remove(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> + uint64_t iova, uint64_t size, uint8_t perm)
>> +{
>> + struct vhost_iotlb_entry *node, *temp_node;
>> +
>> + /* .iotlb_lock already locked by the caller */
>> + TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(node, &vq->iotlb_pending_list, next, temp_node) {
>> + if (node->iova < iova)
>> + continue;
>> + if (node->iova >= iova + size)
>> + continue;
>> + if ((node->perm & perm) != node->perm)
>> + continue;
>> + TAILQ_REMOVE(&vq->iotlb_pending_list, node, next);
>> + rte_mempool_put(vq->iotlb_pool, node);
>> + }
>> +}
>>
>> static void vhost_user_iotlb_cache_remove_all(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>> {
>> @@ -106,7 +185,10 @@ void vhost_user_iotlb_cache_insert(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, uint64_t iova,
>> TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&vq->iotlb_list, new_node, next);
>>
>> unlock:
>> + vhost_user_iotlb_pending_remove(vq, iova, size, perm);
>> +
>> rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&vq->iotlb_lock);
>> +
>
> This empty line should be removed.
Yes, this part disappears in next version, as I squashed patch 21 in
patches 7 & 8.
Thanks,
Maxime
> Best regards,
> Tiwei Bie
>
>> }
>>
>> void vhost_user_iotlb_cache_remove(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-05 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-31 9:50 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/21] Vhost-user: Implement device IOTLB support Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/21] Revert "vhost: workaround MQ fails to startup" Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-07 11:54 ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-09-07 12:59 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-24 10:41 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/21] vhost: make error handling consistent in rx path Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/21] vhost: protect virtio_net device struct Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-05 4:45 ` Tiwei Bie
2017-09-05 9:24 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-05 10:07 ` Tiwei Bie
2017-09-05 11:00 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-06 1:15 ` Tiwei Bie
2017-09-06 2:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-09-06 7:50 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-06 7:15 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-06 7:30 ` Tiwei Bie
2017-09-06 20:02 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-07 5:08 ` Tiwei Bie
2017-09-07 13:44 ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-09-07 14:01 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/21] vhost: prepare send_vhost_message() to slave requests Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/21] vhost: add support to slave requests channel Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-05 4:19 ` Tiwei Bie
2017-09-05 8:18 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/21] vhost: declare missing IOMMU-related definitions for old kernels Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/21] vhost: add iotlb helper functions Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-05 6:02 ` Tiwei Bie
2017-09-05 15:16 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-08 8:08 ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-09-08 8:24 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-08 8:36 ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-09-08 8:50 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-08 9:21 ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-09-08 9:28 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/21] vhost: iotlb: add pending miss request list and helpers Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-05 7:11 ` Tiwei Bie
2017-09-05 15:18 ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/21] vhost-user: add support to IOTLB miss slave requests Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/21] vhost: initialize vrings IOTLB caches Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-04 13:57 ` Remy Horton
2017-09-04 15:45 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 11/21] vhost-user: handle IOTLB update and invalidate requests Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 12/21] vhost: introduce guest IOVA to backend VA helper Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-05 4:14 ` Tiwei Bie
2017-09-05 7:05 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 13/21] vhost: use the guest IOVA to host " Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 14/21] vhost: enable rings at the right time Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 15/21] vhost: don't dereference invalid dev pointer after its reallocation Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-04 13:58 ` Remy Horton
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 16/21] vhost: postpone rings addresses translation Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 17/21] vhost-user: translate ring addresses when IOMMU enabled Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 18/21] vhost-user: iommu: postpone device creation until ring are mapped Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 19/21] vhost: iommu: Invalidate vring in case of matching IOTLB invalidate Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 20/21] vhost: enable IOMMU support Maxime Coquelin
2017-08-31 9:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21/21] vhost: iotlb: reduce iotlb read lock usage Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-11 4:18 ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-09-11 7:34 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-09-11 9:39 ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-09-04 13:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/21] Vhost-user: Implement device IOTLB support Remy Horton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=586f1ce1-d77a-e0ba-5c59-b698bcef4a41@redhat.com \
--to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jfreiman@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=vkaplans@redhat.com \
--cc=yliu@fridaylinux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).