DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
Cc: "Nithin Dabilpuram" <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
	"Akhil Goyal" <gakhil@marvell.com>,
	jerinj@marvell.com, dev@dpdk.org,
	"Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
	techboard@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 00:41:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5925463.UjTJXf6HLC@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALBAE1Mqyef-f-SLZ_L9hJAkdKxrpopfZMDGE+gA4vhBwvR2XQ@mail.gmail.com>

18/04/2023 10:33, Jerin Jacob:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 11:36 PM Stephen Hemminger
> <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 15:34:07 +0530
> > Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com> wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/lib/security/rte_security.h b/lib/security/rte_security.h
> > > index 4bacf9fcd9..866cd4e8ee 100644
> > > --- a/lib/security/rte_security.h
> > > +++ b/lib/security/rte_security.h
> > > @@ -275,6 +275,17 @@ struct rte_security_ipsec_sa_options {
> > >        */
> > >       uint32_t ip_reassembly_en : 1;
> > >
> > > +     /** Enable out of place processing on inline inbound packets.
> > > +      *
> > > +      * * 1: Enable driver to perform Out-of-place(OOP) processing for this inline
> > > +      *      inbound SA if supported by driver. PMD need to register mbuf
> > > +      *      dynamic field using rte_security_oop_dynfield_register()
> > > +      *      and security session creation would fail if dynfield is not
> > > +      *      registered successfully.
> > > +      * * 0: Disable OOP processing for this session (default).
> > > +      */
> > > +     uint32_t ingress_oop : 1;
> > > +
> > >       /** Reserved bit fields for future extension
> > >        *
> > >        * User should ensure reserved_opts is cleared as it may change in
> > > @@ -282,7 +293,7 @@ struct rte_security_ipsec_sa_options {
> > >        *
> > >        * Note: Reduce number of bits in reserved_opts for every new option.
> > >        */
> > > -     uint32_t reserved_opts : 17;
> > > +     uint32_t reserved_opts : 16;
> > >  };
> >
> > NAK
> > Let me repeat the reserved bit rant. YAGNI
> >
> > Reserved space is not usable without ABI breakage unless the existing
> > code enforces that reserved space has to be zero.
> >
> > Just saying "User should ensure reserved_opts is cleared" is not enough.
> 
> Yes. I think, we need to enforce to have _init functions for the
> structures which is using reserved filed.
> 
> On the same note on YAGNI, I am wondering why NOT introduce
> RTE_NEXT_ABI marco kind of scheme to compile out ABI breaking changes.
> By keeping RTE_NEXT_ABI disable by default, enable explicitly if user
> wants it to avoid waiting for one year any ABI breaking changes.
> There are a lot of "fixed appliance" customers (not OS distribution
> driven customer) they are willing to recompile DPDK for new feature.
> What we are loosing with this scheme?

RTE_NEXT_ABI is described in the ABI policy.
We are not doing it currently, but I think we could
when it is not too much complicate in the code.

The only problems I see are:
- more #ifdef clutter
- 2 binary versions to test
- CI and checks must handle RTE_NEXT_ABI version




  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-24 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-09  8:56 [RFC 1/2] " Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-03-09  8:56 ` [RFC 2/2] test/security: add unittest for inline ingress oop Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-04-11 10:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-04-11 10:04   ` [PATCH 2/3] net/cnxk: support inline ingress out of place session Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-04-11 10:04   ` [PATCH 3/3] test/security: add unittest for inline ingress oop Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-04-11 18:05   ` [PATCH 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Stephen Hemminger
2023-04-18  8:33     ` Jerin Jacob
2023-04-24 22:41       ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2023-05-19  8:07         ` Jerin Jacob
2023-05-30  9:23           ` Jerin Jacob
2023-05-30 13:51             ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-05-31  9:26               ` Morten Brørup
2023-07-01  7:15   ` [PATCH] doc: announce addition of new security IPsec SA option Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-07-03 14:35     ` Akhil Goyal
2023-07-04  5:15     ` [PATCH v2] " Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-07-05 14:07       ` Jerin Jacob
2023-07-11  8:55         ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2023-07-06 23:05     ` [PATCH] " Ji, Kai
2023-08-11  8:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-08-11  8:54   ` [PATCH 2/3] net/cnxk: support inline ingress out of place session Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-08-11  8:54   ` [PATCH 3/3] test/security: add unittest for inline ingress oop Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-09-19 19:55   ` [PATCH 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Akhil Goyal
2023-09-21  2:15 ` [PATCH v2 " Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-09-21  2:15   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] net/cnxk: support inline ingress out of place session Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-09-21  2:15   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] test/security: add unittest for inline ingress oop Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-09-21 10:44   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5925463.UjTJXf6HLC@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).