DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
To: Abhinandan Gujjar <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>,
	jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com,
	dev@dpdk.org
Cc: pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com, declan.doherty@intel.com,
	narender.vangati@intel.com, nikhil.rao@intel.com,
	Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-dev, v1, 2/5] eventdev: add crypto adapter implementation
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 19:48:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ea61576-9124-266a-00e6-cb9f22a37f59@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1522824999-61614-1-git-send-email-abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>

Hi Abhinandan,

I have not reviewed the patch completely. But I have below query for 
further review.
On 4/4/2018 12:26 PM, Abhinandan Gujjar wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Abhinandan Gujjar <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>
> ---

[..snip..]
> +
> +int __rte_experimental
> +rte_event_crypto_adapter_queue_pair_add(uint8_t id,
> +					uint8_t cdev_id,
> +					int32_t queue_pair_id)
> +{
> +	struct rte_event_crypto_adapter *adapter;
> +	struct rte_eventdev *dev;
> +	struct crypto_device_info *dev_info;
> +	uint32_t cap;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	RTE_EVENT_CRYPTO_ADAPTER_ID_VALID_OR_ERR_RET(id, -EINVAL);
> +
> +	if (!rte_cryptodev_pmd_is_valid_dev(cdev_id)) {
> +		RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("Invalid dev_id=%" PRIu8, cdev_id);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	adapter = eca_id_to_adapter(id);
> +	if (adapter == NULL)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	dev = &rte_eventdevs[adapter->eventdev_id];
> +	ret = rte_event_crypto_adapter_caps_get(adapter->eventdev_id,
> +						cdev_id,
> +						&cap);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("Failed to get adapter caps dev %" PRIu8
> +			"cdev %" PRIu8, id, cdev_id);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_info = &adapter->cdevs[cdev_id];
> +
> +	if (queue_pair_id != -1 &&
> +	    (uint16_t)queue_pair_id >= dev_info->dev->data->nb_queue_pairs) {
> +		RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("Invalid queue_pair_id %" PRIu16,
> +				 (uint16_t)queue_pair_id);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (cap & RTE_EVENT_CRYPTO_ADAPTER_CAP_INTERNAL_PORT) {
> +		RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(
> +			*dev->dev_ops->crypto_adapter_queue_pair_add,
> +			-ENOTSUP);
> +		if (dev_info->qpairs == NULL) {
> +			dev_info->qpairs =
> +			    rte_zmalloc_socket(adapter->mem_name,
> +					dev_info->dev->data->nb_queue_pairs *
> +					sizeof(struct crypto_queue_pair_info),
> +					0, adapter->socket_id);
> +			if (dev_info->qpairs == NULL)
> +				return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
> +
> +		ret = (*dev->dev_ops->crypto_adapter_queue_pair_add)(dev,
> +				dev_info->dev,
> +				queue_pair_id);

crypto_adapter_queue_pair_add is supposed to attach a queue 
(queue_pair_id) of cryptodev(dev_info->dev) to event device (dev).
But how will the underlying implementation attach it to event device 
without knowing the eventdev queue_id. This information was coming in 
the RFC patches with the parameter (rte_event_crypto_queue_pair_conf). 
Why is this removed and if removed how will the driver attach the queue.
I can see that rte_event is passed in the session private data but how 
can we attach the crypto queue with event dev queue?

Regards,
Akhil

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-17 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-04  6:56 Abhinandan Gujjar
2018-04-17 14:18 ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2018-04-18  6:21   ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2018-04-20 11:34     ` Akhil Goyal
2018-04-20 12:09       ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2018-04-20 13:14       ` Jerin Jacob
2018-04-23  6:39         ` Akhil Goyal
2018-04-23  6:49           ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2018-04-20 12:48 ` Verma, Shally
2018-04-20 15:18   ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5ea61576-9124-266a-00e6-cb9f22a37f59@nxp.com \
    --to=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gage.eads@intel.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=narender.vangati@intel.com \
    --cc=nikhil.rao@intel.com \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).