patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: "Medvedkin, Vladimir" <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
To: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
	bruce.richardson@intel.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stephen@networkplumber.org,
	konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, gavin.hu@arm.com,
	honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, dharmik.thakkar@arm.com,
	nd@arm.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 5/6] test/lpm: reset total time
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 17:17:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <69f7bd6d-cc41-a79a-c4e1-c8db784c9952@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190906094534.36060-6-ruifeng.wang@arm.com>

Hi Ruifeng,

Thanks for this bug fix.

I think it should be sent separately from this RCU related patch series.

On 06/09/2019 10:45, Ruifeng Wang wrote:
> From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
>
> total_time needs to be reset to measure the cycles for delete API.
>
> Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> ---
>   app/test/test_lpm_perf.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
> index 77eea66ad..a2578fe90 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
> @@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ test_lpm_perf(void)
>   			(double)total_time / ((double)ITERATIONS * BATCH_SIZE),
>   			(count * 100.0) / (double)(ITERATIONS * BATCH_SIZE));
>   
> -	/* Delete */
> +	/* Measure Delete */
>   	status = 0;
>   	begin = rte_rdtsc();
>   
> @@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ test_lpm_perf(void)
>   				large_route_table[i].depth);
>   	}
>   
> -	total_time += rte_rdtsc() - begin;
> +	total_time = rte_rdtsc() - begin;
>   
>   	printf("Average LPM Delete: %g cycles\n",
>   			(double)total_time / NUM_ROUTE_ENTRIES);

-- 
Regards,
Vladimir

next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-18 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20190822063457.41596-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
     [not found] ` <20190906094534.36060-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
2019-09-06  9:45   ` Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-18 16:17     ` Medvedkin, Vladimir [this message]
2019-09-19  6:22       ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=69f7bd6d-cc41-a79a-c4e1-c8db784c9952@intel.com \
    --to=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dharmik.thakkar@arm.com \
    --cc=gavin.hu@arm.com \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).