DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
To: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: consider QinQ when setting MTU
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 08:30:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09093B59DADB@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F810D5A096@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>

Hi Ferruh,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wu, Jingjing
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 4:27 PM
> To: Yigit, Ferruh; Lu, Wenzhuo; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: consider QinQ when setting MTU
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit
> > Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 1:55 PM
> > To: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: consider QinQ when setting
> > MTU
> >
> > On 4/28/2017 2:55 AM, Wenzhuo Lu wrote:
> > > When counting max packet length from MTU, count VLAN tag length
> > > twice for QinQ packets.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c    | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 2 +-
> > >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c index 3fa25dc..74041ae 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > > @@ -10593,7 +10593,7 @@ static void i40e_set_default_mac_addr(struct
> > rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > >  	struct i40e_pf *pf = I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_PF(dev->data-
> > >dev_private);
> > >  	struct rte_eth_dev_data *dev_data = pf->dev_data;
> > >  	uint32_t frame_size = mtu + ETHER_HDR_LEN
> > > -			      + ETHER_CRC_LEN + I40E_VLAN_TAG_SIZE;
> > > +			      + ETHER_CRC_LEN + I40E_VLAN_TAG_SIZE * 2;
> >
> > Hi Wenzhuo,
> >
> > Shouldn't we check if QinQ enabled before taking size account?
> 
> Hi, Ferruh
> 
> Checking QinQ enabled here makes no sense, because we don't know If the
> packets is carry single vlan or double vlan.
> 
> Acked-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
BTW, the patch aligned the behavior of kernel driver and DPDK.


  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-28  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-28  1:55 Wenzhuo Lu
2017-04-28  5:55 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-04-28  8:27   ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-04-28  8:30     ` Lu, Wenzhuo [this message]
2017-04-28 12:38     ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-05-02  1:25       ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2017-05-02  1:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Wenzhuo Lu
2017-05-05 15:24   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09093B59DADB@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).