DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kovacevic, Marko" <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "akhil.goyal@nxp.com" <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/compress: fix size of test buffer
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 18:24:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6DC05C7C5F25994B81B3F2F214251F6602080A9A@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190124120555.10548-1-marko.kovacevic@intel.com>

> Changed size of test buffer to 100 to allow qat to run compress unit-test,
> qat_comp_process_response():
> QAT intermediate buffer may be too small for output, try configuring a larger
> size
> 
> Fixes: c1bbb613ce96 ("test/compress: add out of space test")
> Cc: marko.kovacevic@intel.com
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>
> ---
>  test/test/test_compressdev.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/test/test/test_compressdev.c b/test/test/test_compressdev.c
> index e8476ed..4db65c4 100644
> --- a/test/test/test_compressdev.c
> +++ b/test/test/test_compressdev.c
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
>  #define GZIP_HEADER_SIZE 10
>  #define GZIP_TRAILER_SIZE 8
> 
> -#define OUT_OF_SPACE_BUF 1
> +#define OUT_OF_SPACE_BUF 100
> 
>  const char *
>  huffman_type_strings[] = {
> @@ -597,13 +597,15 @@ prepare_sgl_bufs(const char *test_buf, struct
> rte_mbuf *head_buf,
>  		uint32_t total_data_size,
>  		struct rte_mempool *small_mbuf_pool,
>  		struct rte_mempool *large_mbuf_pool,
> -		uint8_t limit_segs_in_sgl)
> +		uint8_t limit_segs_in_sgl,
> +		const struct test_data_params *test_params)
>  {
>  	uint32_t remaining_data = total_data_size;
>  	uint16_t num_remaining_segs = DIV_CEIL(remaining_data,
> SMALL_SEG_SIZE);
>  	struct rte_mempool *pool;
>  	struct rte_mbuf *next_seg;
>  	uint32_t data_size;
> +	unsigned int out_of_space = test_params->out_of_space;
>  	char *buf_ptr;
>  	const char *data_ptr = test_buf;
>  	uint16_t i;
> @@ -639,6 +641,10 @@ prepare_sgl_bufs(const char *test_buf, struct
> rte_mbuf *head_buf,
>  	 * Allocate the rest of the segments,
>  	 * copy the rest of the data and chain the segments.
>  	 */
> +	if (out_of_space)
> +		num_remaining_segs = 1;
> +
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < num_remaining_segs; i++) {
> 
>  		if (i == (num_remaining_segs - 1)) {
> @@ -647,9 +653,11 @@ prepare_sgl_bufs(const char *test_buf, struct
> rte_mbuf *head_buf,
>  				pool = large_mbuf_pool;
>  			else
>  				pool = small_mbuf_pool;
> -			data_size = remaining_data;
> +			out_of_space ? data_size = out_of_space :
> +					(data_size = remaining_data);
>  		} else {
> -			data_size = SMALL_SEG_SIZE;
> +
> +			(data_size = SMALL_SEG_SIZE);
>  			pool = small_mbuf_pool;
>  		}
> 
> @@ -759,7 +767,8 @@ test_deflate_comp_decomp(const struct
> interim_data_params *int_data,
>  					data_size,
>  					ts_params->small_mbuf_pool,
>  					ts_params->large_mbuf_pool,
> -					MAX_SEGS) < 0)
> +					MAX_SEGS,
> +					test_data) < 0)
>  				goto exit;
>  		}
>  	} else {
> @@ -791,7 +800,8 @@ test_deflate_comp_decomp(const struct
> interim_data_params *int_data,
>  					data_size,
>  					ts_params->small_mbuf_pool,
>  					ts_params->large_mbuf_pool,
> -					MAX_SEGS) < 0)
> +					MAX_SEGS,
> +					test_data) < 0)
>  				goto exit;
>  		}
> 
> @@ -1019,7 +1029,8 @@ test_deflate_comp_decomp(const struct
> interim_data_params *int_data,
>  					data_size,
>  					ts_params->small_mbuf_pool,
>  					ts_params->large_mbuf_pool,
> -					MAX_SEGS) < 0)
> +					MAX_SEGS,
> +					test_data) < 0)
>  				goto exit;
>  		}
> 
> --

Self Nack

After some investigation from Pablo and after a conversation was had we have come to the conclusion that there might be an error somewhere else and just a check that needs to be added and that the unit test just exposed it and not that the unit test itself was wrong I can't confirm that as of yet until further investigation is done

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-24 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-24 12:05 Marko Kovacevic
2019-01-24 18:24 ` Kovacevic, Marko [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-01-22 11:17 Marko Kovacevic
2019-01-22 13:43 ` Kovacevic, Marko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6DC05C7C5F25994B81B3F2F214251F6602080A9A@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).