DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
To: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
	Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
	Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] app/testpmd: add trace save command
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 12:52:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ea523e0-12a1-99cd-5682-23537955f63b@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR12MB3753717B34D1EC00243B1D9ADF23A@DM6PR12MB3753.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>

On 6/23/2023 9:00 AM, Slava Ovsiienko wrote:
> Hi, Ferruh
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2023 2:16 PM
>> To: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Aman Singh
>> <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>
>> Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] app/testpmd: add trace save command
>>
>> On 6/13/2023 5:58 PM, Viacheslav Ovsiienko wrote:
>>> The "save_trace" CLI command is added to trigger saving the trace
>>> dumps to the trace directory.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Viacheslav,
>>
>> Trace is already saved when dpdk application terminated, I guess this is to
>> save the trace before exiting the application, what is the use case for this, can
>> you please detail in the commit log.
> 
> OK, will update the commit log. The command "save_trace" is useful in some
> dynamic debug scenarios to save the trace without restarting the entire application.
> 
>>
>> And what happens if this is called multiple times, or what happens on the
>> application exit, will it overwrite the file or fail?
> It overwrites.
> 
>> Again please explain in the commit log.
> Sure, will do.
> 
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
>>> ---
>>>  app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>>>
>>
>> Can you please update documentation too?
>>
>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c index
>>> a15a442a06..db71ce2028 100644
>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>>>  #include <rte_gro.h>
>>>  #endif
>>>  #include <rte_mbuf_dyn.h>
>>> +#include <rte_trace.h>
>>>
>>>  #include <cmdline_rdline.h>
>>>  #include <cmdline_parse.h>
>>> @@ -12745,6 +12746,40 @@ static cmdline_parse_inst_t
>> cmd_config_tx_affinity_map = {
>>>  	},
>>>  };
>>>
>>> +#ifndef RTE_EXEC_ENV_WINDOWS
>>> +/* *** SAVE_TRACE *** */
>>> +
>>> +struct cmd_save_trace_result {
>>> +	cmdline_fixed_string_t save;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static void cmd_save_trace_parsed(__rte_unused void *parsed_result,
>>> +				  __rte_unused struct cmdline *cl,
>>> +				  __rte_unused void *data)
>>> +{
>>> +	int rc;
>>> +
>>> +	rc = rte_trace_save();
>>> +	if (rc)
>>> +		printf("Save trace failed with error: %d\n", rc);
>>> +	else
>>> +		printf("Trace saved successfully\n"); }
>>> +
>>> +static cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_save_trace_save =
>>> +	TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_save_trace_result, save,
>>> +"save_trace");
>>> +
>>
>> We have dump_* commands, what do you think to have 'dump_trace'
>> command for this?
> It was initially (in v1) with "dump_trace" command.
> And there is the comment by Jerin:
> https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/CALBAE1Of79a_jHnFT3KX--Enhud-h5RzL02TMQBsmoW721ds7A@mail.gmail.com/#t
> 
> So, I have changed to "save_trace". I have no strong opinion about command name, any allowing trace save is OK for me.
> 

Ah, I missed that.


@Jerin,
I just saw your comment, agree more exact action can be 'save' but
'dump' also describes enough.
Since there are existing 'dump_*' commands, it makes command more
intuitive and easy to remember.

As an active user of testpmd myself, I am finding it hard to
remember/find the command I need as number of commands increased. That
is why I am paying extra attention to have more hierarchical, consistent
and intuitive commands.

For me "dump_trace" works better in that manner, what do you think, do
you have strong opinion on 'save_trace'?


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-23 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-20 10:07 [RFC 0/5] net/mlx5: introduce Tx datapath tracing Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-04-20 10:07 ` [RFC 1/5] app/testpmd: add trace dump command Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-04-20 10:13   ` Jerin Jacob
2023-04-20 10:08 ` [RFC 2/5] common/mlx5: introduce tracepoints for mlx5 drivers Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-04-20 10:11   ` Jerin Jacob
2023-06-13 15:50     ` Slava Ovsiienko
2023-06-13 15:53       ` Jerin Jacob
2023-06-13 15:59         ` Slava Ovsiienko
2023-06-13 16:01           ` Jerin Jacob
2023-06-27  0:39             ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-06-27  6:15               ` Slava Ovsiienko
2023-06-27  7:28                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-06-27  8:19                   ` Slava Ovsiienko
2023-06-27  9:33                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-06-27  9:43                       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2023-06-27 11:36                         ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-04-20 10:08 ` [RFC 3/5] net/mlx5: add Tx datapath tracing Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-04-20 10:08 ` [RFC 4/5] net/mlx5: add comprehensive send completion trace Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-04-20 10:08 ` [RFC 5/5] net/mlx5: add Tx datapath trace analyzing script Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-09 15:28 ` [PATCH 0/5] net/mlx5: introduce Tx datapath tracing Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-09 15:28   ` [PATCH 1/5] app/testpmd: add trace dump command Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-09 15:28   ` [PATCH 2/5] common/mlx5: introduce tracepoints for mlx5 drivers Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-09 15:28   ` [PATCH 3/5] net/mlx5: add Tx datapath tracing Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-09 15:28   ` [PATCH 4/5] net/mlx5: add comprehensive send completion trace Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-09 15:28   ` [PATCH 5/5] net/mlx5: add Tx datapath trace analyzing script Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-13 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] net/mlx5: introduce Tx datapath tracing Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-13 16:58   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] app/testpmd: add trace save command Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-21 11:15     ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-23  8:00       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2023-06-23 11:52         ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2023-06-23 12:03           ` Jerin Jacob
2023-06-23 12:14             ` Slava Ovsiienko
2023-06-23 12:23             ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-13 16:58   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] common/mlx5: introduce tracepoints for mlx5 drivers Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-13 16:58   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] net/mlx5: add Tx datapath tracing Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-13 16:58   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] net/mlx5: add comprehensive send completion trace Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-13 16:58   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] net/mlx5: add Tx datapath trace analyzing script Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-20 12:00   ` [PATCH v2 0/5] net/mlx5: introduce Tx datapath tracing Raslan Darawsheh
2023-06-27  0:46     ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-06-27 11:24       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2023-06-27 11:34         ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-06-28 14:18           ` Robin Jarry
2023-06-29  7:16             ` Slava Ovsiienko
2023-06-29  9:08               ` Robin Jarry
2023-06-26 11:06 ` [PATCH] app/testpmd: add trace dump command Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-26 11:07 ` [PATCH v3] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-26 11:57 ` [PATCH v4] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-27 11:34   ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-27 11:39     ` Slava Ovsiienko
2023-06-27 11:58       ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-27 14:44     ` [PATCH] app/testpmd: add dump command help message Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-27 18:03       ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-28  9:54         ` [PATCH v2] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-28 13:18           ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-27 13:09 ` [PATCH v5] app/testpmd: add trace dump command Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-27 15:18   ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-28 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] net/mlx5: introduce Tx datapath tracing Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-28 11:09   ` [PATCH v3 1/4] net/mlx5: introduce tracepoints for mlx5 drivers Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-28 11:09   ` [PATCH v3 2/4] net/mlx5: add comprehensive send completion trace Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-28 11:09   ` [PATCH v3 3/4] net/mlx5: add Tx datapath trace analyzing script Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-06-28 11:09   ` [PATCH v3 4/4] doc: add mlx5 datapath tracing feature description Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-07-05 11:10 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] net/mlx5: introduce Tx datapath tracing Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-07-05 11:10   ` [PATCH v4 1/4] net/mlx5: introduce tracepoints for mlx5 drivers Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-07-05 11:10   ` [PATCH v4 2/4] net/mlx5: add comprehensive send completion trace Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-07-05 11:10   ` [PATCH v4 3/4] net/mlx5: add Tx datapath trace analyzing script Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-07-05 11:10   ` [PATCH v4 4/4] doc: add mlx5 datapath tracing feature description Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-07-05 15:31 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] net/mlx5: introduce Tx datapath tracing Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-07-05 15:31   ` [PATCH v5 1/4] net/mlx5: introduce tracepoints for mlx5 drivers Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-07-05 15:31   ` [PATCH v5 2/4] net/mlx5: add comprehensive send completion trace Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-07-05 15:31   ` [PATCH v5 3/4] net/mlx5: add Tx datapath trace analyzing script Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-07-05 15:31   ` [PATCH v5 4/4] doc: add mlx5 datapath tracing feature description Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-07-06 16:27   ` [PATCH v5 0/4] net/mlx5: introduce Tx datapath tracing Raslan Darawsheh
2023-07-11 15:15 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-07-11 15:15   ` [PATCH v6 1/2] net/mlx5: add Tx datapath trace analyzing script Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-07-11 15:15   ` [PATCH v6 2/2] doc: add mlx5 datapath tracing feature description Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2023-07-27 10:52   ` [PATCH v6 0/2] net/mlx5: introduce Tx datapath tracing Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6ea523e0-12a1-99cd-5682-23537955f63b@amd.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).