DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>,
	"Zhang, Roy Fan" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>,
	"Singh, Jasvinder" <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: announce ABI change of struct	rte_port_source_params and rte_port_sink_params
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:42:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7134797.PeUvHm5xl4@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D8912647A3BBB9@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>

2016-07-27 10:08, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> As Thomas mentioned, today is probably the last day to discuss ABI changes. This one is pretty small and straightforward, any issues with it?
> 
> Panu had a concern that the change from "char *" to "const char *" is too small to be regarded as ABI breakage and we should simply go ahead and do it. My conservative proposal was to put a notice anyway.
> 
> Nonetheless, what I would like to get from Thomas and Panu is a path forward for this now:
> a) If we agree to consider this an ABI change, please merge the notice for 16.7;

Panu was noticing 3 things (and I agree with them):
- it is an API change
- they can be grouped in only one list item
- it is better to wait having more changes to break an API

About the third point, in this specific case, I think it is acceptable because:
- it should not break the ABI
- the impact of the API change is really small
- I'm not sure the packet framework should be considered as a DPDK API.

> b) If we agree this is too small for an ABI change, please let us agree now
> to accept our quick patch for 16.11 for this change.

For an API deprecation notice (reworded),
Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>


> > -----Original Message-----
> > The ABI changes are planned for rte_port_source_params and
> > rte_port_sink_params, which will be supported from release 16.11. Here
> > announces that ABI changes in detail.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
> > ---
> > +* ABI will change for rte_port_source_params struct. The member
> > file_name
> > +  data type will be changed from char * to const char *. This change targets
> > +  release 16.11
> > +
> > +* ABI will change for rte_port_sink_params struct. The member file_name
> > +  data type will be changed from char * to const char *. This change targets
> > +  release 16.11

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-27 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-16 13:18 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] doc: announce ABI change of struct rte_port_source_params Fan Zhang
2016-05-16 13:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] " Fan Zhang
2016-05-16 13:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] doc: announce ABI change of struct rte_port_sink_params Fan Zhang
2016-05-16 13:57   ` Panu Matilainen
2016-05-19 14:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: announce ABI change of struct rte_port_source_params and rte_port_sink_params Fan Zhang
2016-07-27 10:08   ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2016-07-27 10:42     ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2016-07-28 18:28       ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7134797.PeUvHm5xl4@xps13 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jasvinder.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=pmatilai@redhat.com \
    --cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).