From: Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
To: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
"Marchand, David" <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
"Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/iavf: fix IAVF_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK definition
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:01:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <71a76142-86f6-729c-c0bc-4be7a41fb77a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM4PR11MB59949AABCC9CC217EBFAEB90D7DFA@DM4PR11MB5994.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 25-Oct-23 12:30 AM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nicolau, Radu <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 10:49 PM
>> To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Marchand, David
>> <david.marchand@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>;
>> dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/iavf: fix IAVF_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK definition
>>
>>
>> On 24-Oct-23 12:24 PM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 6:23 PM
>>>> To: Marchand, David <david.marchand@redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei
>>>> <beilei.xing@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/iavf: fix IAVF_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK definition
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 24-Oct-23 10:49 AM, David Marchand wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 11:13 AM Radu Nicolau
>>>>> <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> IAVF_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK definition contained
>>>> RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_SECURITY
>>>>>> instead of RTE_MBUF_F_TX_SEC_OFFLOAD.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixes: 6bc987ecb860 ("net/iavf: support IPsec inline crypto")
>>>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
>>>>> Something is not clear to me.
>>>>> How was the IPsec inline crypto feature supposed to work with this
>>>>> driver so far?
>>>>>
>>>>> Any packet with the RTE_MBUF_F_TX_SEC_OFFLOAD flag should have
>> been
>>>>> refused in iavf_prep_pkts.
>>>>>
>>>> It worked because the IPsec sample app doesn't call
>>>> rte_eth_tx_prepare, and from what I can see no other sample app does.
>>> To keep consistent, its better to refine the
>> IAVF_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK definition.
>>
>> You mean like this?
>>
>>
>> #define IAVF_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK ( \
>> RTE_MBUF_F_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK ^ ( \
>> RTE_MBUF_F_TX_OUTER_IPV6 | \
>> RTE_MBUF_F_TX_OUTER_IPV4 | \
>> RTE_MBUF_F_TX_IPV6 | \
>> RTE_MBUF_F_TX_IPV4 | \
>> RTE_MBUF_F_TX_VLAN | \
>> RTE_MBUF_F_TX_IP_CKSUM | \
>> RTE_MBUF_F_TX_L4_MASK | \
>> RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TCP_SEG | \
>> RTE_MBUF_F_TX_UDP_SEG | \
>> RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TUNNEL_MASK | \
>> RTE_MBUF_F_TX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM | \
>> RTE_MBUF_F_TX_OUTER_UDP_CKSUM | \
>> RTE_MBUF_F_TX_SEC_OFFLOAD))
> Sorry, I miss understanding this code change, actually you didn't remove a flag, but just replace it, NOTSUP_MASK no need to be changed
>
> Then I don't understand why "Any packet with the RTE_MBUF_F_TX_SEC_OFFLOAD flag should have refused in iavf_prep_pkts"
> But I assume tx_pkt_prepare should reject only invalid packets while still functioning correctly with inline IPsec.
rte_eth_tx_prepare would have rejected the packets before this fix, but
no app calls rte_eth_tx_prepare. The only app that calls it is testpmd.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-25 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-24 9:13 Radu Nicolau
2023-10-24 9:49 ` David Marchand
2023-10-24 10:22 ` Radu Nicolau
2023-10-24 11:24 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2023-10-24 14:48 ` Radu Nicolau
2023-10-24 23:30 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2023-10-25 9:01 ` Radu Nicolau [this message]
2023-10-25 9:07 ` David Marchand
2023-10-25 10:14 ` Radu Nicolau
2023-10-25 1:50 ` Zhang, Qi Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=71a76142-86f6-729c-c0bc-4be7a41fb77a@intel.com \
--to=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).