DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] eal: set affinity for control threads
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 09:04:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <73aaaffb-053d-b8d1-623b-a1dfdc67adc2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180227144630.29613-5-olivier.matz@6wind.com>

On 27-Feb-18 2:46 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> The management threads must not bother the dataplane or service cores.
> Set the affinity of these threads accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> ---

<...>

>   
> +	set_affinity = 0;
> +	CPU_ZERO(&cpuset);
> +	for (lcore_id = 0; lcore_id < RTE_MAX_LCORE; lcore_id++) {
> +		if (eal_cpu_detected(lcore_id) &&
> +				rte_lcore_has_role(lcore_id, ROLE_OFF)) {
> +			CPU_SET(lcore_id, &cpuset);
> +			set_affinity = 1;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	if (set_affinity) {
> +		ret = pthread_setaffinity_np(*thread, sizeof(cpuset), &cpuset);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			goto fail;
> +	}

Hi Olivier,

Please correct me if i'm wrong here, but if all detected cores are busy 
doing something (such as would be the case if DPDK is run without a 
coremask specified), affinity is not set? Maybe set it to master lcore 
instead (perhaps unconditionally - we usually recommend not using master 
lcore for anything important - perhaps setting it to master core always 
would be better, instead of trying to find unused lcores)?

-- 
Thanks,
Anatoly

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-29  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-08 10:26 [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/4] new function to create " Olivier Matz
2017-12-08 10:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/4] eal: use sizeof to avoid a double use of a define Olivier Matz
2017-12-08 10:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 2/4] eal: new function to create control threads Olivier Matz
2017-12-08 10:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 3/4] eal: set name when creating a control thread Olivier Matz
2017-12-08 10:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 4/4] eal: set affinity for control threads Olivier Matz
2018-02-27 14:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] fix control thread affinities Olivier Matz
2018-02-27 14:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] eal: use sizeof to avoid a double use of a define Olivier Matz
2018-02-27 14:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] eal: new function to create control threads Olivier Matz
2018-02-27 14:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] eal: set name when creating a control thread Olivier Matz
2018-02-27 14:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] eal: set affinity for control threads Olivier Matz
2018-03-29  8:04     ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]
2018-03-30  7:30       ` Olivier Matz
2018-03-28 12:54   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] fix control thread affinities Olivier Matz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=73aaaffb-053d-b8d1-623b-a1dfdc67adc2@intel.com \
    --to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).