DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anoob Joseph <anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Nelio Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>,
	Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>,
	Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
Cc: anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add Egress flow actions
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 14:35:12 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <78f97959-bf6c-33cc-e758-d232013ea159@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89add3272024fefe644a9e636a476c85d39e398b.1513264386.git.nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>

Hi Nelio,


On 12/14/2017 08:44 PM, Nelio Laranjeiro wrote:
> Add Egress flow create for devices supporting
> RTE_SECURITY_TX_HW_TRAILER_OFFLOAD.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nelio Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
> ---
>   examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c | 8 ++++++++
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c
> index 8e8dc6df7..d49970ad8 100644
> --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c
> +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c
> @@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ create_session(struct ipsec_ctx *ipsec_ctx, struct ipsec_sa *sa)
>   
>   			sa->action[0].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SECURITY;
>   			sa->action[0].conf = sa->sec_session;
> +			sa->action[1].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END;
>   
>   			sa->attr.egress = (sa->direction ==
>   					RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS);
> @@ -253,6 +254,13 @@ create_session(struct ipsec_ctx *ipsec_ctx, struct ipsec_sa *sa)
>   							&err);
>   				if (ret)
>   					goto flow_create_failure;
> +			} else if (sa->attr.egress &&
> +				   (sa->ol_flags &
> +				    RTE_SECURITY_TX_HW_TRAILER_OFFLOAD)) {
If this flag is not set, the following code won't be executed, but it 
would still try to create the flow. And if the flow create fails in that 
case, then create_session would fail. I would suggest moving the 
flow_create also into the block (for ingress and egress). Or may be 
initialize the flow with actions END+END+END, and add 
SECURITY+<RSS/QUEUE/PASSTHRU>+END as it hits various conditions. I'm not 
sure what the flow_create would do for such an action. This would look 
ugly in any case. See if you get any better ideas!
> +					sa->action[1].type =
> +						RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PASSTHRU;
> +					sa->action[2].type =
> +						RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END;
>   			}
>   flow_create:
>   			sa->flow = rte_flow_create(sa->portid,

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-15  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-23 15:12 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix missing ingress flow attribute Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-11-23 15:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: add target queues in flow actions Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-11-29 12:30   ` Anoob
2017-11-29 12:50     ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-11-30 10:46       ` Anoob
2017-11-30 12:28         ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-01 15:04           ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-01 16:26             ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-04 14:11   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix missing ingress flow attribute Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-11 11:50     ` Radu Nicolau
2017-12-04 14:11   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: add target queues in flow actions Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-07  9:47     ` Anoob
2017-12-07 12:22       ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-08 14:00     ` Anoob
2017-12-08 14:40       ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-08 16:40         ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-11  8:21           ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-11  9:00             ` Anoob
2017-12-11 14:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix missing ingress flow attribute Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-12  7:14       ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-11 14:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: add target queues in flow actions Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-12 12:43       ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-12 13:44         ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-12 14:04           ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-12 14:38             ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-13  6:41               ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-13 10:02                 ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-13 11:38                   ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-13 12:53                     ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-13 13:53                       ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-13 14:47                         ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-20 16:19                           ` Boris Pismenny
2017-12-21  8:06                             ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-21 10:12                               ` Boris Pismenny
2017-12-21 14:22                                 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-01-05  6:18                                   ` Anoob Joseph
2018-01-09 12:48                                     ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2018-01-10  6:21                                       ` Anoob Joseph
2018-01-05  5:52                                 ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-14 15:14       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix missing ingress flow attribute Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-14 15:14       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add target queues in flow actions Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-18  8:23         ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-18  9:57           ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2017-12-14 15:14       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add Egress " Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-15  9:05         ` Anoob Joseph [this message]
2017-12-15 13:53           ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-15 15:39             ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-15 16:53               ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-15 17:01                 ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-18 10:24         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix missing ingress flow attribute Nelio Laranjeiro
2018-01-18 14:50           ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-12-18 10:24         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add target queues in flow actions Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-19  6:22           ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-18 10:24         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add Egress " Nelio Laranjeiro
2018-01-08 16:13           ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-01-16 16:12           ` Nicolau, Radu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=78f97959-bf6c-33cc-e758-d232013ea159@caviumnetworks.com \
    --to=anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com \
    --cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
    --cc=sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).