DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: "Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
	"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
	"Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
	"Zhang, Qi" <qi.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix to ensure vector mode is not used
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:07:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7d1b6aaf-7ba5-4bb3-db44-6e83ef054e93@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C224D53012@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>

On 4/12/2017 2:54 PM, Iremonger, Bernard wrote:
> Hi Qi,
> 
> <snip>
> 
> 
> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Zhang, Qi Z
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 12:43 PM
>>>> To: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>>>> Cc: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo
>>>> <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi <qi.zhang@intel.com>; Iremonger,
>>>> Bernard <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
>>>> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix to ensure vector mode
>>>> is not used
>>>>
>>>> Hi Bernard:
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bernard
>>>> Iremonger
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:01 PM
>>>>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>>>>> Cc: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo
>>>>> <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi <qi.zhang@intel.com>;
>> Iremonger,
>>>>> Bernard <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
>>>>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix to ensure vector mode is
>>>>> not used
>>>>>
>>>>> In rx vector mode, the QinQ VLAN tag is not stripped.
>>>>> When hw_vlan_extend is set for QinQ ensure that rx vector mode is
>>>>> not selected.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: ca74903b75cf ("net/i40e: extract non-x86 specific code from
>>>>> vector
>>>>> driver")
>>>>
>>>> Why fixes? I didn't see above commit change rx callback function if
>>>> hw_vlan_extend == 1
>>>
>>> Some of the QinQ functionality was introduced in 17.02, this
>>> functionality also has the same issue.
>>> So I added a fixes line.
>>
>> If you think this patch is a fix, you need to find the commit that introduce this
>> issue The commit ca74903b75cf is not the root cause of the issue, it just move
>> the code from I40e_rxtx_vec.c to i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h
>>
>> Regards
>> Qi
>>
> This is a fix to the  i40e_rx_vec_dev_conf_condition_check_default() function.
> The issue is caused because there is no check on the   hw_vlan_extend flag at present.
> This is the correct fixline for that function.
> ca74903b75 (Jianbo Liu   2016-10-14 09:30:00 +0530 221) i40e_rx_vec_dev_conf_condition_check_default(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> 
> I will send a v2 as I should have added the "Cc: stable@dpdk.org"  line.

Hi Bernard,

I agree with Qi, the commit you are using is just moves function to a
common header, you are not fixing that.

Perhaps fixline can be the commit that adds QinQ support, because it
forgets adding hw_vlan_extend check?

byw, since this common function used by other vector drivers, neon and
altivec, will this something effect them, is there any case
"hw_vlan_extend == 1" but other vector drivers can be used?

Thanks,
ferruh

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Bernard.
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-12 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-11 15:01 Bernard Iremonger
2017-04-12 11:43 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2017-04-12 12:30   ` Iremonger, Bernard
2017-04-12 12:42     ` Zhang, Qi Z
2017-04-12 13:54       ` Iremonger, Bernard
2017-04-12 14:07         ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2017-04-12 14:16           ` Zhang, Qi Z
2017-04-12 15:05             ` Iremonger, Bernard
2017-04-12 14:37           ` Iremonger, Bernard
2017-04-12 15:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Bernard Iremonger
2017-04-13  9:53   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Bernard Iremonger
2017-04-18  9:58     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-04-18 10:04       ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2017-04-19 13:10         ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7d1b6aaf-7ba5-4bb3-db44-6e83ef054e93@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).