patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>
To: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"Wei, FangfangX" <fangfangx.wei@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
	"Liu,  Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/6] net/virtio: fix wrong Rx/Tx method for secondary process
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 08:02:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E3B4D643B@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170109051919.GB21228@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>

Fangfang, 
Could you help double confirm below error and the patchset ? Thanks. 
http://dpdk.org/patch/18975

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 1:19 PM
> To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q.xu@intel.com>; Liu,
> Yong <yong.liu@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/6] net/virtio: fix wrong Rx/Tx method for
> secondary process
> 
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 03:15:00PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Fri,  6 Jan 2017 18:16:16 +0800
> > Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > If the primary enables the vector Rx/Tx path, the current code would
> > > let the secondary always choose the non vector Rx/Tx path. This
> > > results to a Rx/Tx method mismatch between primary and secondary
> > > process. Werid errors then may happen, something like:
> > >
> > >     PMD: virtio_xmit_pkts() tx: virtqueue_enqueue error: -14
> > >
> > > Fix it by choosing the correct Rx/Tx callbacks for the secondary process.
> > > That is, use vector path if it's given.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 8d8393fb1861 ("virtio: pick simple Rx/Tx")
> > >
> > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > This is failing on intel compile tests.
> >
> >
> > http://dpdk.org/patch/18975
> 
> Thanks, but it looks like a false alarm to me, for reasons below.
> 
> > Failed Build #2:
> > OS: RHEL7.2_64
> > Target: x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
> > MKRES test_resource_c.res.o  /home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-
> native-linuxapp-gcc/lib/librte_ethdev.a(rte_ethdev.o): In function
> `rte_eth_dev_pci_probe':
> > rte_ethdev.c:(.text+0x9c4): undefined reference to
> `eth_dev_attach_secondary'
> > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> 
> - eth_dev_attach_secondary is not defined in this patch, it's defined
>   (and used) in the first patch.
> 
> - eth_dev_attach_secondary is actually defined; The report even shows
>   it fails to build with gcc: the gcc build passes on my dev box.
> 
> Honestly, I seldom trusted the build reports from STV.
> 
> 	--yliu

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-09  8:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1482391123-8149-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
2016-12-22  7:18 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/3] net/virtio: fix crash " Yuanhan Liu
2016-12-22  7:18 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 2/3] net/virtio: fix multiple process support Yuanhan Liu
2016-12-22  7:18 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 3/3] net/virtio: fix wrong Rx/Tx method for secondary process Yuanhan Liu
     [not found] ` <1482922962-21036-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
2016-12-28 11:02   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 1/6] ethdev: fix port data mismatched in multiple process model Yuanhan Liu
2016-12-28 11:02   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 2/6] net/virtio: fix wrong Rx/Tx method for secondary process Yuanhan Liu
     [not found]   ` <1482922962-21036-6-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
2016-12-28 11:14     ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 5/6] net/virtio: fix multiple process support Yuanhan Liu
     [not found]   ` <1483697780-12088-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
2017-01-06 10:16     ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 1/6] ethdev: fix port data mismatched in multiple process model Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-09  7:50       ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4] " Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-09 17:08         ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-10 14:33           ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-11 13:32             ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-12  3:10               ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-19 18:39         ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-01-20  7:58           ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-06 10:16     ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 2/6] net/virtio: fix wrong Rx/Tx method for secondary process Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-08 23:15       ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Stephen Hemminger
2017-01-09  5:19         ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-01-09  8:02           ` Xu, Qian Q [this message]
2017-01-09  8:05             ` Wei, FangfangX
2017-01-06 10:16     ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 5/6] net/virtio: fix multiple process support Yuanhan Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E3B4D643B@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=qian.q.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fangfangx.wei@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=yong.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).