From: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
"Bie, Tiwei" <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
Cc: "Wang, Zhihong" <zhihong.wang@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/8] net/virtio: support IN_ORDER Rx and Tx
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 14:27:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E630CBF12@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f5f200d2-a2c6-f327-29b0-38ca889ad57d@redhat.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coquelin@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 4:18 PM
> To: Liu, Yong <yong.liu@intel.com>; Bie, Tiwei <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
> Cc: Wang, Zhihong <zhihong.wang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] net/virtio: support IN_ORDER Rx and Tx
>
>
>
> On 06/25/2018 05:17 PM, Marvin Liu wrote:
> > IN_ORDER Rx function can support merge-able feature. Descriptors
> My understanding of the code is that IN_ORDER Rx function only supports
> mergeable feature (and it seems to be confirmed by patch 7).
>
> So maybe change the text to:
> "IN_ORDER Rx function requires merge-able feature."
Thanks for point out this, Rx function choice was depended on merge-able feature. Will change comment in next release.
>
> > allocation and free will be done in bulk.
> >
> > Virtio dequeue logic:
> > dequeue_burst_rx(burst mbufs)
> > for (each mbuf b) {
> > if (b need merge) {
> > merge remained mbufs
> > add merged mbuf to return mbufs list
> > } else {
> > add mbuf to return mbufs list
> > }
> > }
> > if (last mbuf c need merge) {
> > dequeue_burst_rx(required mbufs)
> > merge last mbuf c
> > }
> > refill_avail_ring_bulk()
> > update_avail_ring()
> > return mbufs list
> >
> > IN_ORDER Tx function can support offloading features. Packets can't be
> s/can support/supports/
>
> > transmitted by IN_ORDER Tx will be handled by normal Tx.
>
> Can you clarify why some packets can't be transmitted by IN_ORDER Tx?
My previous description may not clear, all Tx descriptors will be saved to avail ring in-order.
For making code clean, packets which matched "can_push" option will be handled by simple xmit inorder function.
Those packets can't match "can_push" will be handled one by one by previous xmit function.
Thanks,
Marvin
>
> > Virtio enqueue logic:
> > xmit_cleanup(used descs)
> > for (each xmit mbuf b) {
> > if (b can inorder xmit) {
> > add mbuf b to inorder burst list
> > continue
> > } else {
> > xmit inorder burst list
> > xmit mbuf b with normal xmit
> > }
> > }
> > if (inorder burst list not empty) {
> > xmit inorder burst list
> > }
> > update_avail_ring()
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
> >
>
>
> Other than above clarification needed, the code looks good to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Maxime
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-27 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-25 15:17 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/8] support VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER feature Marvin Liu
2018-06-25 15:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/8] vhost: announce VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER support Marvin Liu
2018-06-26 7:54 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-06-25 15:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/8] net/virtio: add VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER definition Marvin Liu
2018-06-26 7:58 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-06-25 15:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/8] net/virtio-user: add mrg_rxbuf and in_order vdev parameters Marvin Liu
2018-06-27 6:53 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-06-25 15:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/8] net/virtio: free IN_ORDER descriptors before device start Marvin Liu
2018-06-27 6:58 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-06-25 15:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/8] net/virtio: extract common part for IN_ORDER functions Marvin Liu
2018-06-27 6:59 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-06-25 15:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/8] net/virtio: support IN_ORDER Rx and Tx Marvin Liu
2018-06-27 8:18 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-06-27 14:27 ` Liu, Yong [this message]
2018-06-27 14:32 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-06-25 15:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 7/8] net/virtio: add IN_ORDER Rx/Tx into selection Marvin Liu
2018-06-27 8:19 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-06-28 14:11 ` Liu, Yong
2018-06-25 15:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 8/8] net/virtio: annouce VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER support Marvin Liu
2018-06-27 8:20 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-06-26 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/8] support VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER feature Maxime Coquelin
2018-06-26 8:01 ` Liu, Yong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E630CBF12@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=yong.liu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).