DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
	John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] doc: document NIC features
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 15:53:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8948822.3HyaHf9bfD@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c0c639a6-996c-161b-c5db-ee5402871524@intel.com>

07/07/2017 15:37, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 7/7/2017 11:55 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> > Also some PMDs have few implementations of the datapath (like vector and 
> > usual). Ideally
> > we need common way to highlight it. May be it is OK that control path 
> > features are duplicated
> > in this case, but ideally it should be expressed somehow.
> 
> I agree different datapath implementations can be documented better, I
> just don't know how to do ...
> 
> For some drivers there are multiple vector implementations and the
> feature set for them is not clear. And as you said control features are
> duplicated in the table.
> 
> Perhaps control and datapath features can be separated.
> 
> Or as Thomas suggested sometime ago, vector and scalar version can be
> merged into one in the table and feature can be marked as supported if
> both scalar and vector has support for it. But this is not solving
> multiple vector implementation problem.

Yes it is the way to go.
The features should not be different from a datapath implementation to
another one. So they must be merged in only one column.
If a feature is not supported in every datapaths of a driver, it should
be marked as partially supported... and the developers must implement it.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-07 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-15 16:37 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] " Ferruh Yigit
2017-06-21 13:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Ferruh Yigit
2017-06-22 19:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ferruh Yigit
2017-07-02 20:20     ` Mcnamara, John
2017-07-05 13:20     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Ferruh Yigit
2017-07-05 16:03       ` Mcnamara, John
2017-07-07 10:55       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2017-07-07 13:37         ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-07-07 13:53           ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2017-07-07 13:57             ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-07-07 14:02               ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-07 14:13                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-07-07 14:20                   ` Wiles, Keith
2017-07-07 20:37                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-07 23:54                       ` Wiles, Keith
2017-07-07 15:06         ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-07-07 15:38           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2017-07-07 17:21       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Ferruh Yigit
2017-07-08  9:47         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2017-07-20  9:10           ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-07-20  9:23         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Ferruh Yigit
2017-07-26  5:08           ` Shreyansh Jain
2017-08-01 10:15             ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-08-01 15:23           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Ferruh Yigit
2017-08-03  8:56             ` Shreyansh Jain
2017-08-03  8:57               ` Shreyansh Jain
2017-08-03 10:42             ` Mcnamara, John
2017-08-03 22:57             ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-08-04  8:56               ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-08-04  9:32                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-08-04 10:04                   ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-08-04 10:10                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-08-04 11:11                   ` Mcnamara, John
2017-08-04 11:40                     ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-08-04 13:06             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] " Ferruh Yigit
2017-08-04 13:34               ` Mcnamara, John
2017-08-05  9:34               ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8948822.3HyaHf9bfD@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).