From: "Wang, Zhihong" <zhihong.wang@intel.com>
To: "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/2] lib/librte_eal: Remove unnecessary hugepage zero-filling
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 06:32:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8F6C2BD409508844A0EFC19955BE0941834B7D@SHSMSX152.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4B19B621@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xie, Huawei
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 2:05 PM
> To: Wang, Zhihong <zhihong.wang@intel.com>; Stephen Hemminger
> <stephen@networkplumber.org>; Richardson, Bruce
> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/2] lib/librte_eal: Remove unnecessary
> hugepage zero-filling
>
> On 11/19/2015 10:16 AM, Wang, Zhihong wrote:
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen
> >> Hemminger
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 3:09 AM
> >> To: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/2] lib/librte_eal: Remove
> >> unnecessary hugepage zero-filling
> >>
> >> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:13:32 +0000
> >> "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen
> >>>> Hemminger
> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 4:00 PM
> >>>> To: Xie, Huawei <huawei.xie@intel.com>
> >>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> >>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/2] lib/librte_eal: Remove
> >>>> unnecessary hugepage zero-filling
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:07:54 +0000
> >>>> "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>> The kernel fills new allocated (huge) pages with zeros.
> >>>>>>>> DPDK just has to touch the pages to trigger the allocation.
> >>>>> I think we shouldn't reply on the assumption that kernel has
> >>>>> zeroed the memory. Kernel zeroes the memory mostly to avoid
> >>>>> information leakage.It could also achieve this by setting each bit to 1.
> >>>>> What we indeed need to check is later DPDK initialization code
> >>>>> doesn't assume the memory has been zeroed. Otherwise zero only
> >>>>> that part of the memory. Does this makes sense?
> >>>> If all new pages are zero, why does DPDK have to pre-touch the
> >>>> pages at all?
> >>> The pages won't actually be mapped into the processes address space
> >>> until
> >> accessed.
> >>> /Bruce
> >> Isn't that what mmap MAP_POPULATE flag (not currently used) will do.
> > Yes, the MAP_POPULATE does literally the same thing.
> > This flag is implemented since Linux 2.5.46 according to Linux man
> > page, guess that's why DPDK fault the page tables manually in the
> > first place. :)
> >
> > I think we can use this flag since it makes the code clearer.
> The manual says MAP_POPULATE is only supported for private mappings since
> Linux 2.6.23.
I've done check before and MAP_SHARED | MAP_POPULATE worked together correctly. Is there any implicit complication here?
> >
> > /Zhihong
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-19 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-18 3:27 [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/2] Reduce DPDK initialization time Zhihong Wang
2015-11-18 3:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/2] lib/librte_eal: Reduce timer " Zhihong Wang
2015-11-18 3:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/2] lib/librte_eal: Remove unnecessary hugepage zero-filling Zhihong Wang
2015-11-18 10:39 ` Mcnamara, John
2015-11-18 10:44 ` Wang, Zhihong
2015-11-18 12:07 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-11-18 16:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-11-18 16:13 ` Richardson, Bruce
2015-11-18 19:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-11-19 2:15 ` Wang, Zhihong
2015-11-19 6:04 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-11-19 6:32 ` Wang, Zhihong [this message]
2015-11-19 9:18 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2015-11-23 2:54 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-11-23 10:18 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-11-20 12:15 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-11-19 3:54 ` Wang, Zhihong
2015-11-19 6:09 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-11-19 9:14 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2015-11-23 3:46 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-11-23 4:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-11-23 5:05 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-11-23 6:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-11-25 18:24 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-12-24 8:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/2] Reduce DPDK initialization time Qiu, Michael
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8F6C2BD409508844A0EFC19955BE0941834B7D@SHSMSX152.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=huawei.xie@intel.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).