From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org, mst@redhat.com, yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mbuf: add rte_pktmbuff_reset_headroom function
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 18:11:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b1847c7-e1a7-7477-8937-1e49c3ec0a8f@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475151633-6785-1-git-send-email-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Hi Maxime,
On 09/29/2016 02:20 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Some application use rte_mbuf_raw_alloc() function to improve
> performance by not resetting mbuf's fields to their default state.
>
> This can be however problematic for mbuf consumers that need some
> headroom, meaning that data_off field gets decremented after
> allocation. When the mbuf is re-used afterwards, there might not
> be enough room for the consumer to prepend anything, if the data_off
> field is not reset to its default value.
>
> This patch adds a new rte_pktmbuf_reset_headroom() function that
> applications can call to reset the data_off field.
> This patch also replaces current data_off affectations in the mbuf
> lib with a call to this function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Sounds like a good idea. Just one small comment below.
>
> /**
> + * Reset the data_off field of a packet mbuf to its default value.
> + *
> + * The given mbuf must have only one segment.
> + *
> + * @param m
> + * The packet mbuf's data_off field has to be reset.
> + */
> +static inline void rte_pktmbuf_reset_headroom(struct rte_mbuf *m)
> +{
> + m->data_off = RTE_MIN(RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM, (uint16_t)m->buf_len);
> +}
Maybe we should also highlight in the API comment that the segment
should be empty.
Thanks,
Olivier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-03 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-29 12:20 Maxime Coquelin
2016-09-29 12:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] app/testpmd/txonly: Reset headroom after raw packet allocation Maxime Coquelin
2016-10-03 16:11 ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2016-10-04 11:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mbuf: add rte_pktmbuff_reset_headroom function Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8b1847c7-e1a7-7477-8937-1e49c3ec0a8f@6wind.com \
--to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).