DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>,
	Wei Dai <wei.dai@intel.com>, Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: force offloading API rules
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2018 12:29:27 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e87a4f4-ae17-d39c-e1bc-0ba0fb1fb85e@solarflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b45afc03-608e-c1a5-4ebd-0cd0c4281ec1@intel.com>

On 06/08/2018 10:51 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 5/31/2018 1:44 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> The error path was disabled in previous release to let apps to be more
>> flexible.
>>
>> But this release they are enabled, applications have to obey offload API
>> rules otherwise they will get errors from following APIs:
>> rte_eth_dev_configure
>> rte_eth_rx_queue_setup
>> rte_eth_tx_queue_setup
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>> ---
>> Cc: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>
>> Cc: Wei Dai <wei.dai@intel.com>
>> Cc: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
> Any objection to this patch?
> I really would like to get this early to catch any possible issue.

I think it should be pushed just after old offload API removal since
if it is pushed before, it should take old offload API into account in
Tx queue setup function.

Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-06-09  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-31 12:44 Ferruh Yigit
2018-06-08 19:51 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-06-08 20:01   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-06-13 15:16     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-06-14 11:11       ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-06-09  9:29   ` Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2018-06-08 20:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-06-09 18:43   ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-06-27  8:31 Ido Goshen
2018-06-27  9:23 ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8e87a4f4-ae17-d39c-e1bc-0ba0fb1fb85e@solarflare.com \
    --to=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=wei.dai@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).