DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ethdev: use strlcpy instead of snprintf on initialization
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 10:48:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f248bd3-1ae6-c8a1-ee6e-37742bd6ea90@solarflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190228224754.26511-3-stephen@networkplumber.org>

On 3/1/19 1:47 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Don't need to use snprintf for simple name copy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> ---
>   lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> index 95889ed206db..8bd54dcf58c1 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ rte_eth_dev_allocate(const char *name)
>   	}
>   
>   	eth_dev = eth_dev_get(port_id);
> -	snprintf(eth_dev->data->name, sizeof(eth_dev->data->name), "%s", name);
> +	strlcpy(eth_dev->data->name, name, RTE_ETH_NAME_MAX_LEN);

Why is sizeof() substituted with RTE_ETH_NAME_MAX_LEN?
I thought that sizeof() is the first choice in such cases since it is a 
bit more
safer vs possible changes in the code.

BTW, wouldn't it be more friendly to check name length on entry and
reject if it is too long? (and same for rte_eth_dev_create())
I agree that strlcpy() should be used anyway.

>   	eth_dev->data->port_id = port_id;
>   	eth_dev->data->mtu = ETHER_MTU;
>   

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-01  7:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-28 22:47 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] ethdev: use strlcpy Stephen Hemminger
2019-02-28 22:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: replace snprintf with strlcpy Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-01  7:40   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-02-28 22:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ethdev: use strlcpy instead of snprintf on initialization Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-01  6:54   ` Rami Rosen
2019-03-01  7:48   ` Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2019-03-01 18:42     ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-04  9:11       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-03-04 19:12         ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-06 15:55           ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-13 18:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] ethdev: use strlcpy Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8f248bd3-1ae6-c8a1-ee6e-37742bd6ea90@solarflare.com \
    --to=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).