From: "Eads, Gage" <gage.eads@intel.com>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"arybchenko@solarflare.com" <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
"gavin.hu@arm.com" <gavin.hu@arm.com>,
"Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com" <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
"nd@arm.com" <nd@arm.com>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] test/stack: add stack test
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 05:11:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9184057F7FC11744A2107296B6B8EB1E541ECD63@FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190225105914.2zsmvp2ighvsbeqi@platinum>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz@6wind.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 4:59 AM
> To: Eads, Gage <gage.eads@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; arybchenko@solarflare.com; Richardson, Bruce
> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; gavin.hu@arm.com;
> Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com; nd@arm.com; thomas@monjalon.net
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] test/stack: add stack test
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:06:51AM -0600, Gage Eads wrote:
> > stack_autotest performs positive and negative testing of the stack
> > API, and exercises the push and pop datapath functions with all available
> lcores.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>
>
> [...]
>
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/test/test/test_stack.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,394 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > + * Copyright(c) 2019 Intel Corporation */
> > +
> > +#include <string.h>
> > +
> > +#include <rte_lcore.h>
> > +#include <rte_malloc.h>
> > +#include <rte_random.h>
> > +#include <rte_stack.h>
> > +
> > +#include "test.h"
> > +
> > +#define STACK_SIZE 4096
> > +#define MAX_BULK 32
> > +
> > +static int
> > +test_stack_push_pop(struct rte_stack *s, void **obj_table, unsigned
> > +int bulk_sz) {
> > + void *popped_objs[STACK_SIZE];
> > + unsigned int i, ret;
>
> Here, a dynamic sized table is used. In test_stack_basic() below, it uses a heap-
> based allocation for the same purpose. I think it would be more consistent to
> have the same method for both. I suggest to allocate in heap to avoid a stack
> overflow if STACK_SIZE is increased in the future.
>
Sure, I'll make popped_objs dynamically allocated.
> [...]
>
> > +static int
> > +test_stack_basic(void)
> > +{
> > + struct rte_stack *s = NULL;
> > + void **obj_table = NULL;
> > + int i, ret = -1;
> > +
> > + obj_table = rte_calloc(NULL, STACK_SIZE, sizeof(void *), 0);
> > + if (obj_table == NULL) {
> > + printf("[%s():%u] failed to calloc %lu bytes\n",
> > + __func__, __LINE__, STACK_SIZE * sizeof(void *));
> > + goto fail_test;
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < STACK_SIZE; i++)
> > + obj_table[i] = (void *)(uintptr_t)i;
> > +
> > + s = rte_stack_create(__func__, STACK_SIZE, rte_socket_id(), 0);
> > + if (s == NULL) {
> > + printf("[%s():%u] failed to create a stack\n",
> > + __func__, __LINE__);
> > + goto fail_test;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (rte_stack_lookup(__func__) != s) {
> > + printf("[%s():%u] failed to lookup a stack\n",
> > + __func__, __LINE__);
> > + goto fail_test;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (rte_stack_count(s) != 0) {
> > + printf("[%s():%u] stack count: %u (expected 0)\n",
> > + __func__, __LINE__, rte_stack_count(s));
> > + goto fail_test;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (rte_stack_free_count(s) != STACK_SIZE) {
> > + printf("[%s():%u] stack free count: %u (expected %u)\n",
> > + __func__, __LINE__, rte_stack_count(s), STACK_SIZE);
> > + goto fail_test;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = test_stack_push_pop(s, obj_table, 1);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + printf("[%s():%u] Single object push/pop failed\n",
> > + __func__, __LINE__);
> > + goto fail_test;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = test_stack_push_pop(s, obj_table, MAX_BULK);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + printf("[%s():%u] Bulk object push/pop failed\n",
> > + __func__, __LINE__);
> > + goto fail_test;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = rte_stack_push(s, obj_table, 2 * STACK_SIZE);
> > + if (ret != 0) {
> > + printf("[%s():%u] Excess objects push succeeded\n",
> > + __func__, __LINE__);
> > + goto fail_test;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = rte_stack_pop(s, obj_table, 1);
> > + if (ret != 0) {
> > + printf("[%s():%u] Empty stack pop succeeded\n",
> > + __func__, __LINE__);
> > + goto fail_test;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = 0;
> > +
> > +fail_test:
> > + rte_stack_free(s);
> > +
> > + if (obj_table != NULL)
> > + rte_free(obj_table);
> > +
>
> The if can be removed.
Ah, I didn't know rte_free() checks for NULL. Will remove.
>
> > +static int
> > +test_stack_name_length(void)
> > +{
> > + char name[RTE_STACK_NAMESIZE + 1];
> > + struct rte_stack *s;
> > +
> > + memset(name, 's', sizeof(name));
> > +
> > + s = rte_stack_create(name, STACK_SIZE, rte_socket_id(), 0);
> > + if (s != NULL) {
> > + printf("[%s():%u] Failed to prevent long name\n",
> > + __func__, __LINE__);
> > + return -1;
> > + }
>
> Here, "name" is not a valid string (no \0 at the end). It does not hurt because the
> length check is properly done in the lib, but we could imagine that the wrong
> name is logged by the library on error, which would trigger a crash here. So I
> suggest to pass a valid string instead.
Good catch. Will fix.
Thanks,
Gage
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-28 5:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 228+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-22 16:06 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Subject: [PATCH ...] Add stack library and new mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-02-25 10:43 ` Olivier Matz
2019-02-28 5:10 ` Eads, Gage
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/7] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-02-25 10:46 ` Olivier Matz
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-02-25 10:59 ` Olivier Matz
2019-02-28 5:11 ` Eads, Gage [this message]
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/7] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-02-25 11:04 ` Olivier Matz
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/7] stack: add non-blocking stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-02-25 11:28 ` Olivier Matz
[not found] ` <2EC44CCD3517A842B44C82651A5557A14AF13386@fmsmsx118.amr.corp.intel.com>
2019-03-01 20:53 ` [dpdk-dev] FW: " Eads, Gage
2019-03-01 21:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-01 21:29 ` Eads, Gage
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/7] test/stack: add non-blocking stack tests Gage Eads
2019-02-25 11:28 ` Olivier Matz
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] mempool/stack: add non-blocking stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-02-25 11:29 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-03-14 8:00 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-14 8:00 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-28 23:26 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-28 23:26 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-29 19:23 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-29 19:23 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-29 21:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-29 21:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01 17:41 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 17:41 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 19:34 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01 19:34 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-03-14 8:00 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-14 8:00 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-14 8:01 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-14 8:01 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-28 23:27 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-28 23:27 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-29 19:25 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-29 19:25 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-14 8:04 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-14 8:04 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-28 23:27 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-28 23:27 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-29 19:24 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-29 19:24 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01 0:06 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01 0:06 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01 19:06 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 19:06 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 20:21 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01 20:21 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 18:08 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 18:08 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-02 11:14 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-02 11:14 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-03 17:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 17:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 17:13 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 17:13 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 17:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 17:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-02 11:11 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-02 11:11 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 17:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/8] Add stack library and new " Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 17:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 17:10 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 17:10 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 " Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/8] Add stack library and new " Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 20:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 20:49 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 20:49 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 " Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 22:41 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 22:41 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 23:05 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 23:05 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 13:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 13:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 14:14 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-04 14:14 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 7:34 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 7:34 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/8] Add stack library and new " Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 15:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9184057F7FC11744A2107296B6B8EB1E541ECD63@FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=gage.eads@intel.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gavin.hu@arm.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).