From: "Eads, Gage" <gage.eads@intel.com>
To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
"arybchenko@solarflare.com" <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
"Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>,
nd <nd@arm.com>, "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
nd <nd@arm.com>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 19:25:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9184057F7FC11744A2107296B6B8EB1E5420D94F@FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VE1PR08MB514913AF291D82A8E5B90D2798590@VE1PR08MB5149.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Honnappa Nagarahalli [mailto:Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 6:27 PM
> To: Eads, Gage <gage.eads@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com; arybchenko@solarflare.com; Richardson, Bruce
> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
> <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>; thomas@monjalon.net; nd
> <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation
>
> <snip>
>
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.c
> > b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.c index
> > 96dffdf44..8f0361ea1 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.c
>
> <snip>
>
> > @@ -63,9 +81,16 @@ rte_stack_create(const char *name, unsigned int
> > count, int socket_id,
> > unsigned int sz;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - RTE_SET_USED(flags);
> > +#ifdef RTE_ARCH_X86_64
> > + RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct rte_stack_lf_head) != 16);
> This check should be independent of the platform.
Good catch. Will change the ifdef to RTE_ARCH_64.
[snip]
> > +/**
> > + * @internal Push several objects on the lock-free stack (MT-safe).
> > + *
> > + * @param s
> > + * A pointer to the stack structure.
> > + * @param obj_table
> > + * A pointer to a table of void * pointers (objects).
> > + * @param n
> > + * The number of objects to push on the stack from the obj_table.
> > + * @return
> > + * Actual number of objects enqueued.
> > + */
> > +static __rte_always_inline unsigned int __rte_experimental
> This is an internal function. Is '__rte_experimental' tag required? (applies to
> other instances in this patch)
(Addressed in comments to patch 1/8)
[snip]
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -225,7 +339,10 @@ rte_stack_free_count(struct rte_stack *s)
> > * NUMA. The value can be *SOCKET_ID_ANY* if there is no NUMA
> > * constraint for the reserved zone.
> > * @param flags
> > - * Reserved for future use.
> > + * An OR of the following:
> > + * - RTE_STACK_F_LF: If this flag is set, the stack uses lock-free
> > + * variants of the push and pop functions. Otherwise, it achieves
> > + * thread-safety using a lock.
> > * @return
> > * On success, the pointer to the new allocated stack. NULL on error with
> > * rte_errno set appropriately. Possible errno values include:
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_generic.h
> > b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_generic.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000..5e4cbc38e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_generic.h
> The name "...stack_generic.h" is confusing. It is implementing LF algorithm.
> IMO, the code should be re-organized differently.
> rte_stack.h, rte_stack.c - Contain the APIs (calling std or LF based on the flag)
> and top level structure definition rte_stack_std.c, rte_stack_std.h - Contain
> the standard implementation rte_stack_lf.c, rte_stack_lf.h - Contain the LF
> implementation rte_stack_lf_c11.h - Contain the LF C11 implementation
>
'generic' here refers to the "generic API for atomic operations" (generic/rte_atomic.h:12), but I see how that can be misleading.
Yeah, I like this proposal, but with one tweak: use three lock-free header files: rte_stack_lf.h (common inline lock-free functions like rte_stack_lf_pop()), rte_stack_lf_c11.h (C11 implementation), rte_stack_lf_generic.h (generic atomic implementation). Since the name is *_lf_generic.h, it should be clear that it implements the lock-free functions, and this naming matches rte ring's (easier to pick up for those already used to the ring organization).
[snip]
> > + /* old_head is updated on failure */
> > + success = rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange(
> > + (rte_int128_t *)&list->head,
> > + (rte_int128_t *)&old_head,
> > + (rte_int128_t *)&new_head,
> > + 1, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE,
> > + __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
> Just wondering if 'rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange' for x86 should have
> compiler barriers based on the memory order passed?
> C++11 memory model is getting mixed with barrier based model. I think this
> is something that needs to be discussed at a wider level.
The x86 implementation uses a compiler barrier (i.e. the inline assembly clobber list contains "memory") regardless of the memory order, so we're (conservatively) adhering to the C11 model, which guarantees ordering at both the compiler and processor levels. Whether/how we relax the x86 implementation (e.g. no compiler barrier if ordering == relaxed) is an interesting question.
Thanks,
Gage
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-29 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 228+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-22 16:06 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Subject: [PATCH ...] Add stack library and new mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-02-25 10:43 ` Olivier Matz
2019-02-28 5:10 ` Eads, Gage
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/7] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-02-25 10:46 ` Olivier Matz
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-02-25 10:59 ` Olivier Matz
2019-02-28 5:11 ` Eads, Gage
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/7] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-02-25 11:04 ` Olivier Matz
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/7] stack: add non-blocking stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-02-25 11:28 ` Olivier Matz
[not found] ` <2EC44CCD3517A842B44C82651A5557A14AF13386@fmsmsx118.amr.corp.intel.com>
2019-03-01 20:53 ` [dpdk-dev] FW: " Eads, Gage
2019-03-01 21:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-01 21:29 ` Eads, Gage
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/7] test/stack: add non-blocking stack tests Gage Eads
2019-02-25 11:28 ` Olivier Matz
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] mempool/stack: add non-blocking stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-02-25 11:29 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-03-14 8:00 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-14 8:00 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-28 23:26 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-28 23:26 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-29 19:23 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-29 19:23 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-29 21:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-29 21:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01 17:41 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 17:41 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 19:34 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01 19:34 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-03-14 8:00 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-14 8:00 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-14 8:01 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-14 8:01 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-28 23:27 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-28 23:27 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-29 19:25 ` Eads, Gage [this message]
2019-03-29 19:25 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-14 8:04 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-14 8:04 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-28 23:27 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-28 23:27 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-29 19:24 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-29 19:24 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01 0:06 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01 0:06 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01 19:06 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 19:06 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 20:21 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01 20:21 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 18:08 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 18:08 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-02 11:14 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-02 11:14 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-03 17:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 17:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 17:13 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 17:13 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 17:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 17:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-02 11:11 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-02 11:11 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 17:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/8] Add stack library and new " Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 17:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 17:10 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 17:10 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 " Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/8] Add stack library and new " Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 20:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 20:49 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 20:49 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 " Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 22:41 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 22:41 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 23:05 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 23:05 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 13:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 13:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 14:14 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-04 14:14 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 7:34 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 7:34 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/8] Add stack library and new " Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 15:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9184057F7FC11744A2107296B6B8EB1E5420D94F@FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=gage.eads@intel.com \
--cc=Gavin.Hu@arm.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).