DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eads, Gage" <gage.eads@intel.com>
To: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	 "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
	"Rao, Nikhil" <nikhil.rao@intel.com>,
	"Carrillo, Erik G" <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>,
	"nhorman@tuxdriver.com" <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: promote some service core functions to stable
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 18:39:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9184057F7FC11744A2107296B6B8EB1E68CFF91C@FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7tv9x0ru55.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com>

> Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com> writes:
> 
> > The functions rte_service_may_be_active(),
> > rte_service_lcore_attr_get(), and rte_service_attr_reset_all() were
> > introduced nearly a year ago in DPDK 18.08. They can be considered non-
> experimental for the 19.08 release.
> >
> > rte_service_may_be_active() is used by eventdev and the sw PMD, and
> > this commit allows them to not need any experimental API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/event/sw/Makefile                   |  1 -
> >  drivers/event/sw/meson.build                |  1 -
> >  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_service.h | 15 +++------------
> >  lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c         |  6 +++---
> >  lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map          |  6 +++---
> >  lib/librte_eventdev/Makefile                |  1 -
> >  lib/librte_eventdev/meson.build             |  1 -
> >  7 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/event/sw/Makefile b/drivers/event/sw/Makefile
> > index 81236a392..c6600e836 100644
> > --- a/drivers/event/sw/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/event/sw/Makefile
> > @@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ include $(RTE_SDK)/mk/rte.vars.mk  LIB =
> > librte_pmd_sw_event.a
> >
> >  # build flags
> > -CFLAGS += -DALLOW_EXPERIMENTAL_API
> >  CFLAGS += -O3
> >  CFLAGS += $(WERROR_FLAGS)
> >  # for older GCC versions, allow us to initialize an event using diff
> > --git a/drivers/event/sw/meson.build b/drivers/event/sw/meson.build
> > index 30d221647..985012219 100644
> > --- a/drivers/event/sw/meson.build
> > +++ b/drivers/event/sw/meson.build
> > @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
> >  # SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause  # Copyright(c) 2017 Intel
> > Corporation
> >
> > -allow_experimental_apis = true
> 
> I don't think you can remove these.  There are still some experimental APIs
> (f.e. the rename for rte_cryptodev_sym_session_get_private_data
> marked that function as experimental and it will cause build breakage).
> 
> Maybe I'm mis understanding it?  It would be good to get verification from
> Bruce whether that API should not be marked as experimental (it was just a
> rename, so not sure...) - maybe that's a follow up for this patch?
> 
> See: https://travis-ci.com/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/209722145 for an example
> 
> The odd thing is I only see it on the clang builds - perhaps it's a missing
> definition for the clang compiler.
> 

You're right, eventdev still uses that experimental API (which this patch is unrelated to). I tested this change with GCC (5.4.0) and it built without errors, which I took to mean no more experimental APIs were in use. That's concerning that GCC didn't catch it.

At any rate, I'll correct this in v2.

Thanks,
Gage

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-20 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-20 16:42 Gage Eads
2019-06-20 18:25 ` Aaron Conole
2019-06-20 18:39   ` Eads, Gage [this message]
2019-06-20 19:45   ` David Marchand
2019-06-20 20:16     ` David Marchand
2019-06-21 12:45       ` David Marchand
2019-06-21 16:27         ` Neil Horman
2019-06-21 16:47           ` David Marchand
2019-06-21 17:40             ` Neil Horman
2019-06-21 19:58               ` David Marchand
2019-06-22 16:17                 ` Neil Horman
2019-06-22 17:51                   ` David Marchand
2019-06-22 19:33                     ` Neil Horman
2019-06-20 19:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Gage Eads
2019-06-27 12:48   ` David Marchand
2019-06-27 16:25     ` Eads, Gage
2019-07-08 10:23   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9184057F7FC11744A2107296B6B8EB1E68CFF91C@FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=gage.eads@intel.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=erik.g.carrillo@intel.com \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=nikhil.rao@intel.com \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).