DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>
To: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
	"Jastrzebski, MichalX K" <michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] i40e: fix out-of-bounds access
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 02:00:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <94479800C636CB44BD422CB454846E013AC228@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160705132618.GC23500@bricha3-MOBL3>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richardson, Bruce
> Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 9:26 PM
> To: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> Cc: Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu@intel.com>; Jastrzebski, MichalX K
> <michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] i40e: fix out-of-bounds access
> 
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 02:10:05PM +0800, Beilei Xing wrote:
> > When calling i40e_flowtype_to_pctype in
> > i40e_get_hash_filter_global_config and
> > i40e_set_hash_filter_global_config, function i40e_flowtype_to_pctype
> > will be possibly out-of-bounds accessed, because size of callee's
> > array is 15. So judge flow type before calling
> > i40e_flowtype_to_pctype.
> > Meanwhile do the same change in other functions.
> >
> > Coverity issue: 37793, 37794
> >
> > Fixes: 782c8c92f13f ("i40e: add hash configuration")
> > Fixes: f2b2e2354bbd ("i40e: split function for hash and flow director
> > input")
> > Fixes: 98f055707685 ("i40e: configure input fields for RSS or flow
> > director")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c index a1cad37..111a552 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > @@ -6908,6 +6908,9 @@ i40e_get_hash_filter_global_config(struct
> i40e_hw *hw,
> >  		mask &= ~(1UL << i);
> >  		/* Bit set indicats the coresponding flow type is supported */
> >  		g_cfg->valid_bit_mask[0] |= (1UL << i);
> > +		/* if flowtype is invalid, continue */
> > +		if (!I40E_VALID_FLOW(i))
> > +			continue;
> >  		pctype = i40e_flowtype_to_pctype(i);
> >  		reg = i40e_read_rx_ctl(hw, I40E_GLQF_HSYM(pctype));
> >  		if (reg & I40E_GLQF_HSYM_SYMH_ENA_MASK)
> 
> Rather than having the same check done in multiple places, is there a reason
> why we can't just put the check once in i40e_flowtype_to_pctype?

Since the return value type of i40e_flowtype_to_pctype is " enum i40e_filter_pctype ", although put the check in i40e_flowtype_to_pctype, we should check return value after every i40e_flowtype_to_pctype calling. I think there's no more improvement.
Besides, check valid flow type is called before i40e_flowtype_to_pctype in some places previously, such as function i40e_hash_filter_inset_select and i40e_fdir_filter_inset_select.

/Beilei

> 
> /Bruce

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-06  2:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-30  7:34 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] i40e: fix coverity defects Beilei Xing
2016-07-04 13:58 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-07-05  1:47   ` Xing, Beilei
2016-07-05  6:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] " Beilei Xing
2016-07-05  6:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] i40e: fix log error Beilei Xing
2016-07-05 13:24     ` Bruce Richardson
2016-07-05  6:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] i40e: fix dereference before null check Beilei Xing
2016-07-05 13:24     ` Bruce Richardson
2016-07-05  6:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] i40e: fix out-of-bounds access Beilei Xing
2016-07-05 13:26     ` Bruce Richardson
2016-07-06  2:00       ` Xing, Beilei [this message]
2016-07-08 15:23         ` Bruce Richardson
2016-07-08 15:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] fix coverity defects Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=94479800C636CB44BD422CB454846E013AC228@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).